Suppr超能文献

一线联合疗法与吉西他滨单药疗法治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Efficacy of first-line combination therapies versus gemcitabine monotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

作者信息

Huang Wen-Kuan, Hung Yu-Liang, Tsai Chun-Yi, Wu Chiao-En, Chou Wen-Chi, Hsu Jun-Te, Yeh Ta-Sen, Chen Jen-Shi, Wang Shang-Yu, Yeh Chun-Nan

机构信息

Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou Taoyuan, Taiwan.

College of Medicine, Chang Gung University Taoyuan, Taiwan.

出版信息

Am J Cancer Res. 2024 Jul 15;14(7):3523-3532. doi: 10.62347/TQRB4608. eCollection 2024.

Abstract

Various first-line gemcitabine-based or fluorouracil-based combination regimens were approved in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent randomized clinical trials (RCTs) have investigated chemotherapy backbones in combination with novel investigational drugs, including chemotherapy agents or targeted drugs. However, the comparative efficacy of these different combination therapies remains limited. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy of first-line combination therapies for advanced pancreatic cancer. The study included 46 RCTs with 10,499 patients and 47 distinct regimens, using data sources from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Clinical Trials, and ClinicalTrials.gov from January 1, 2010 to April 23, 2024. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included overall response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). The analysis revealed that gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel (GA), GA with platinum and fluorouracil (GA+Plat+FU), gemcitabine with fluorouracil (G+FU), G+Plt+FU, and FOLFIRINOX were associated with superior OS and PFS compared to gemcitabine monotherapy. Triplet or quadruplet polychemotherapy combinations, such as GA+Plat+FU, G+Plt+FU, and FOLFIRINOX, demonstrated better OS benefit with hazard ratios of 0.42 (95% CI, 0.26-0.68), 0.41 (95% CI, 0.24-0.71), and 0.58 (95% CI, 0.48-0.71), respectively, compared to doublet regimens like GA and G+FU, which had hazard ratios of 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59-0.82) and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72-0.95), respectively. Notably, no targeted drugs, monoclonal antibodies, or other medications showed improved survival when added to chemotherapy backbones. These findings support the use of gemcitabine-based or fluorouracil-based triplet or quadruplet regimens for better survival outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Further research is warranted to explore the potential benefits of adding chemotherapy agents, such as fluorouracil, to the GA doublet regimen.

摘要

多种基于吉西他滨或氟尿嘧啶的一线联合治疗方案已被批准用于晚期胰腺癌患者。近期的随机临床试验(RCT)研究了化疗主干联合新型研究药物,包括化疗药物或靶向药物。然而,这些不同联合治疗的比较疗效仍然有限。本系统评价和网状Meta分析旨在评估晚期胰腺癌一线联合治疗的疗效。该研究纳入了46项RCT,涉及10499例患者和47种不同方案,使用的数据来源为2010年1月1日至2024年4月23日期间的MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane临床试验和ClinicalTrials.gov。主要结局为总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS),次要结局包括总缓解率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。分析显示,与吉西他滨单药治疗相比,吉西他滨+纳米白蛋白紫杉醇(GA)、GA联合铂和氟尿嘧啶(GA+Plat+FU)、吉西他滨联合氟尿嘧啶(G+FU)、G+Plt+FU和FOLFIRINOX与更优的OS和PFS相关。三联或四联多药化疗联合方案,如GA+Plat+FU、G+Plt+FU和FOLFIRINOX,与双联方案如GA和G+FU相比,显示出更好的OS获益,风险比分别为0.42(95%CI,0.26-0.68)、0.41(95%CI,0.24-0.71)和0.58(95%CI,0.48-0.71),而GA和G+FU的风险比分别为0.70(95%CI,0.59-0.82)和0.82(95%CI,0.72-0.95)。值得注意的是,没有靶向药物、单克隆抗体或其他药物在加入化疗主干后显示出生存改善。这些发现支持使用基于吉西他滨或氟尿嘧啶的三联或四联方案,以改善晚期胰腺癌患者的生存结局。有必要进一步研究探索在GA双联方案中加入化疗药物如氟尿嘧啶的潜在益处。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

4
IPDfromKM: reconstruct individual patient data from published Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2021 Jun 1;21(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s12874-021-01308-8.
5
Cancer Statistics, 2021.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2021 Jan;71(1):7-33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. Epub 2021 Jan 12.
6
Phase 1 study of Gemcitabine/Nab-paclitaxel/S-1 in patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer (GeNeS1S trial).
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2021 Jan;87(1):65-71. doi: 10.1007/s00280-020-04174-1. Epub 2020 Oct 24.
7
Pancreatic cancer.
Lancet. 2020 Jun 27;395(10242):2008-2020. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30974-0.
9
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验