Suppr超能文献

日本使用的一线化疗方案治疗转移性胰腺癌的比较结果:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析

Comparative Outcomes of First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer Among the Regimens Used in Japan: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

作者信息

Takumoto Yuki, Sasahara Yuriko, Narimatsu Hiroto, Akazawa Manabu

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Epidemiology, Meiji Pharmaceutical University, Tokyo, Japan.

Center for Outcomes Research and Economic Evaluation for Health, National Institute of Public Health, Saitama, Japan.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Jan 4;5(1):e2145515. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.45515.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Various first-line chemotherapy treatment regimens for patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer have been approved in Japan, including gemcitabine (GEM); fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin combination (FOLFIRINOX); GEM plus albumin-bound paclitaxel (GEM+NPTX), and S-1 (tegafur + gimeracil + oteracil). However, direct comparisons of these chemotherapy regimens are limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the short-term and long-term outcomes associated with first-line chemotherapy regimens for metastatic pancreatic cancer compared with chemotherapy regimens recommended in Japanese guidelines.

DATA SOURCES

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis, the bibliographic databases PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, as well as medical journals published between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2018, were searched for clinical trials comparing chemotherapy regimens.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized 2-arm clinical trials evaluating first-line chemotherapy for advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were included.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Extension Statement for Reporting of Systematic Reviews Incorporating Network Meta-analyses of Health Care Interventions was followed for data abstractions. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The SIGN 50 Quality Assessment Instrument was used to assess the risk of bias and overall study quality of the selected trials.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary end point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) compared with GEM for first-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer. The Kaplan-Meier curve of GEM from the literature and the estimated hazard ratios (HRs) were used to model the long-term associations to calculate the area under the curve (AUC) (person-months) for OS and PFS of each chemotherapy. Sensitivity analyses with multiple functional models were conducted to confirm the long-term estimations.

RESULTS

A total of 22 regimens (25 studies) for OS and a total of 18 regimens (21 studies) for PFS were identified from literature. The total number of participants was 10 186, with 5856 male (57.5%) and 4330 female (42.5%). The FOLFIRINOX and GEM+NPTX regimens were associated with reduction in the risk of death, with an HR of 0.57 (95% CI, 0.41-0.79) and 0.72 (95% CI, 0.55-0.95) compared with GEM, respectively. The curve estimation also showed that FOLFIRINOX had the largest AUC for survival at 15.49 person-months (range, 13.84-15.51 person-months), followed by GEM+NPTX with 12.36 person-months (range, 10.98-12.59 person-months), GEM+ERLO with 10.84 person-months (range, 9.66-11.23 person-months), S-1 with 8.44 person-months (range, 8.26-9.74 person-months), and GEM with 8.10 person-months (range, 7.93-9.38 person-months).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

The results of this network meta-analysis support the relative short-term and long-term outcomes associated with first-line chemotherapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer used clinically in Japan.

摘要

重要性

在日本,已批准多种用于转移性胰腺癌患者的一线化疗方案,包括吉西他滨(GEM);氟尿嘧啶、亚叶酸钙、伊立替康和奥沙利铂联合方案(FOLFIRINOX);GEM加白蛋白结合型紫杉醇(GEM+NPTX)以及S-1(替加氟+吉美嘧啶+奥替拉西)。然而,这些化疗方案的直接比较有限。

目的

评估与日本指南推荐的化疗方案相比,转移性胰腺癌一线化疗方案的短期和长期疗效。

数据来源

在这项系统评价和网状Meta分析中,检索了文献数据库PubMed、Cochrane图书馆和Web of Science以及2002年1月1日至2018年12月31日期间发表的医学期刊,以查找比较化疗方案的临床试验。

研究选择

纳入评估晚期或转移性胰腺癌一线化疗的随机双臂临床试验。

数据提取与合成

数据提取遵循《卫生保健干预网络Meta分析系统评价报告的系统评价和Meta分析首选报告项目》(PRISMA)扩展声明。使用随机效应模型汇总数据。采用SIGN 50质量评估工具评估所选试验的偏倚风险和总体研究质量。

主要结局和指标

主要终点为总生存期(OS),次要终点为无进展生存期(PFS),与用于转移性胰腺癌一线化疗的GEM方案进行比较。利用文献中GEM的Kaplan-Meier曲线和估计的风险比(HR)对长期关联进行建模,以计算每种化疗方案的OS和PFS的曲线下面积(AUC)(人月数)。采用多种功能模型进行敏感性分析以确认长期估计值。

结果

从文献中确定了22种OS方案(25项研究)和18种PFS方案(21项研究)。参与者总数为10186人,其中男性5856人(57.5%),女性4330人(42.5%)。与GEM方案相比,FOLFIRINOX和GEM+NPTX方案与死亡风险降低相关,HR分别为0.57(95%CI,0.41-0.79)和0.72(95%CI,0.55-0.95)。曲线估计还显示,FOLFIRINOX的生存AUC最大,为15.49人月(范围13.84-15.51人月),其次是GEM+NPTX为12.36人月(范围10.98-12.59人月),GEM+ERLO为10.84人月(范围9.66-11.23人月),S-1为8.44人月(范围8.26-9.74人月),GEM为8.10人月(范围7.93-9.38人月)。

结论与意义

该网状Meta分析结果支持日本临床使用的转移性胰腺癌一线化疗的相对短期和长期疗效。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0540/8804927/1cf6eed78d38/jamanetwopen-e2145515-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验