Department Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Department of Viroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2024 Sep 4;68(9):e0065024. doi: 10.1128/aac.00650-24. Epub 2024 Aug 13.
Burn wounds are a major burden, with high mortality rates due to infections. is a major causative agent of burn wound infections, which can be difficult to treat because of antibiotic resistance and biofilm formation. An alternative to antibiotics is the use of bacteriophages, viruses that infect and kill bacteria. We investigated the efficacy of bacteriophage therapy for burn wound infections, in both a porcine and a newly developed human skin model. In both models, the efficacy of a reference antibiotic treatment (fusidic acid) and bacteriophage treatment was determined for a single treatment, successive treatment, and prophylaxis. Both models showed a reduction in bacterial load after a single bacteriophage treatment. Increasing the frequency of bacteriophage treatments increased bacteriophage efficacy in the human skin model, but not in the porcine model. In both models, prophylaxis with bacteriophages increased treatment efficacy. In all cases, bacteriophage treatment outperformed fusidic acid treatment. Both models allowed investigation of bacteriophage-bacteria dynamics in burn wounds. Overall, bacteriophage treatment outperformed antibiotic control underlining the potential of bacteriophage therapy for the treatment of burn wound infections, especially when used prophylactically.
烧伤创面是一个主要负担,由于感染导致死亡率很高。 是烧伤创面感染的主要病原体,由于抗生素耐药性和生物膜形成,治疗变得困难。抗生素的替代品是噬菌体的使用,即感染和杀死细菌的病毒。我们研究了噬菌体疗法在猪和新开发的人类皮肤模型中治疗烧伤创面感染的疗效。在这两种模型中,均确定了参考抗生素治疗(夫西地酸)和噬菌体治疗的单次治疗、连续治疗和预防效果。两种模型在单次噬菌体治疗后均显示细菌负荷减少。增加噬菌体治疗的频率增加了人类皮肤模型中的噬菌体疗效,但在猪模型中没有。在这两种模型中,噬菌体预防均增加了治疗效果。在所有情况下,噬菌体治疗均优于夫西地酸治疗。这两种模型均允许研究烧伤创面中噬菌体-细菌的动态。噬菌体治疗总体上优于抗生素对照,强调了噬菌体疗法治疗烧伤创面感染的潜力,尤其是预防性使用时。