Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong Special administrative regions of China.
Faculty of Dentistry, The University of Hong Kong, 34 Hospital Road, Hong Kong Special administrative regions of China; School of Dental Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4BW, UK.
J Dent. 2024 Oct;149:105312. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105312. Epub 2024 Aug 16.
To investigate caries preventive effects of 38 % silver diamine fluoride (SDF) pretreatment on neighboring tooth proximal to glass ionomer cement (GIC), including conventional GIC (CGIC) and resin-modified GIC (RMGIC) restorations in an in vitro model.
HUMAN TOOTH BLOCKS WERE RESTORED WITH: SDF+CGIC (Group 1), CGIC (Group 2), SDF+RMGIC (Group 3) or RMGIC (Group 4). Enamel specimen simulating proximal surface of neighboring tooth was placed in proximity to the restorations. The specimen underwent cariogenic challenge with cross-kingdom biofilm of Streptococcus mutans, Lacticaseibacillus casei and Candida albicans. After cariogenic challenge, the biofilm's growth kinetics, viability, and morphology were evaluated by propidium monoazide-quantitative polymerase chain reaction (PMA-qPCR), confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. The enamel lesion depth, surface morphology and crystal characteristics were determined by micro-computed tomography (micro-CT), SEM and X-ray diffraction (XRD), respectively.
PMA-qPCR demonstrated lower microbial growth in Group 1 and 3 compared with Group 2 and 4 (p < 0.05). CLSM showed the dead-to-live ratio in Groups 1-4 were 1.15±0.12, 0.53±0.13, 1.10±0.24 and 0.63±0.10, respectively (Group 1,3 > 2,4, p < 0.05). SEM revealed Groups 1 and 3 had scattered biofilm whereas Group 2 and 4 had confluent biofilm. Micro-CT showed the enamel lesion depths (µm) were 98±9, 126±7, 103±6 and 128±7 for Group 1 to 4, respectively (Group 1,3 < 2,4, p < 0.05). SEM revealed oriented and ordered enamel prismatic patterns in Group 1 and 3, not in Group 2 and 4. XRD showed the reflections of hydroxyapatite in Groups 1 and 3 were sharper than Groups 2 and 4.
SDF pretreatment enhances the preventive effect of GIC on proximal enamel surface on neighboring tooth through inhibiting cariogenic biofilm, reducing enamel demineralization and promoting enamel remineralization.
SDF pretreatment of GIC restorations can help prevent caries on neighboring teeth, particular for patients with high caries risk.
在体外模型中,研究 38%的银胺氟(SDF)预处理对邻牙近中玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)的防龋效果,包括传统 GIC(CGIC)和树脂改性 GIC(RMGIC)修复体。
用以下方法修复人牙块:SDF+CGIC(第 1 组)、CGIC(第 2 组)、SDF+RMGIC(第 3 组)或 RMGIC(第 4 组)。将模拟邻牙近中表面的釉质标本放置在修复体附近。该标本用变形链球菌、干酪乳杆菌和白色念珠菌的跨王国生物膜进行致龋挑战。致龋挑战后,通过碘化丙啶单偶氮定量聚合酶链反应(PMA-qPCR)、共聚焦激光扫描显微镜(CLSM)和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)分别评估生物膜的生长动力学、活力和形态。通过微计算机断层扫描(micro-CT)、SEM 和 X 射线衍射(XRD)分别确定釉质病变深度、表面形态和晶体特征。
PMA-qPCR 显示第 1 组和第 3 组的微生物生长低于第 2 组和第 4 组(p<0.05)。CLSM 显示第 1-4 组的死/活比分别为 1.15±0.12、0.53±0.13、1.10±0.24 和 0.63±0.10(第 1、3 组>第 2、4 组,p<0.05)。SEM 显示第 1 组和第 3 组的生物膜呈散在分布,而第 2 组和第 4 组的生物膜呈融合分布。micro-CT 显示第 1 组至第 4 组的釉质病变深度(µm)分别为 98±9、126±7、103±6 和 128±7(第 1、3 组<第 2、4 组,p<0.05)。SEM 显示第 1 组和第 3 组的釉质呈定向有序的棱柱形图案,而第 2 组和第 4 组则没有。XRD 显示第 1 组和第 3 组的羟基磷灰石反射更尖锐,而第 2 组和第 4 组则不尖锐。
SDF 预处理通过抑制致龋生物膜、减少釉质脱矿和促进釉质再矿化,增强了 GIC 对邻牙近中釉质表面的防龋效果。
GIC 修复体的 SDF 预处理有助于预防邻牙龋齿,特别是对高龋齿风险的患者。