Suppr超能文献

收肌管阻滞联合膝神经关节支阻滞与局部浸润镇痛用于全膝关节置换术的比较:一项随机非劣效性试验。

Adductor canal block combined with genicular nerve block versus local infiltration analgesia for total knee arthroplasty: a randomized noninferiority trial.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, No. 1 Youyi Road, Chongqing, 400016, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

J Orthop Surg Res. 2024 Sep 6;19(1):546. doi: 10.1186/s13018-024-05048-5.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This randomized controlled and double-blind study aimed to investigate whether the analgesic effect of the adductor canal block (ACB) combined with the genicular nerve block (GNB) after total knee arthroplasty is noninferior to that of the adductor canal block combined with local infiltration analgesia (LIA).

METHODS

A total of 102 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty under general anesthesia were included and randomly divided into: ACB + GNB and ACB + LIA groups; the ACB + LIA group received 80 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine with adrenaline 10 µg/mL for LIA, whereas the ACB + GNB group received 4 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for the blockade of five peri-knee nerves. The primary outcome was the median difference in the visual analog scale scores at rest at 24 h between the two groups. Secondary outcomes involved the median differences in the pain scores at other time points. Other outcomes included the cumulative dosage of opioids calculated in morphine equivalents in the first 24 h and indicators related to knee joint functional recovery.

RESULTS

In total, 36 and 38 patients were included in the ACB + GNB and ACB + LIA groups, respectively. We found that the median difference (95% confidence internal) in postoperative rest pain at 24 h (noninferiority criteria, △ = 1) was - 0.5 (- 1 to 0, p = 0.002). The median difference in cumulative opioid consumption was 1 mg (- 1 to 3, p = 0.019), meeting the noninferiority criteria, △ = 7.7 mg.

CONCLUSIONS

ACB combined with GNB provides noninferior analgesia compared to ACB with LIA on the first day after total knee arthroplasty while significantly reducing local anesthetic use.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Name of the Registry: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry; Trial Registration Number: ChiCTR2300074274; Date of Registration. August 2, 2023.

摘要

目的

本随机对照、双盲研究旨在探讨全膝关节置换术后股内侧肌管阻滞(ACB)联合膝神经阻滞(GNB)的镇痛效果是否不劣于 ACB 联合局部浸润镇痛(LIA)。

方法

纳入 102 例行全身麻醉下全膝关节置换术的患者,随机分为:ACB+GNB 组和 ACB+LIA 组;ACB+LIA 组接受 80 mL 含肾上腺素 10μg/mL 的 0.2%罗哌卡因行 LIA,而 ACB+GNB 组接受 4 mL 0.2%罗哌卡因用于阻滞膝关节周围 5 条神经。主要结局为两组患者术后 24 h 静息时视觉模拟评分(VAS)中位数差值。次要结局包括其他时间点疼痛评分的中位数差值。其他结局包括 24 h 内吗啡等效镇痛药物累积剂量和与膝关节功能恢复相关的指标。

结果

共纳入 36 例和 38 例患者分别进入 ACB+GNB 组和 ACB+LIA 组。结果发现,术后 24 h 静息疼痛的中位数差值(95%置信区间)(非劣效性标准,△=1)为-0.5(-1 至 0,p=0.002)。累积阿片类药物消耗的中位数差值为 1 mg(-1 至 3,p=0.019),符合非劣效性标准,△=7.7 mg。

结论

与 ACB+LIA 相比,ACB 联合 GNB 可在全膝关节置换术后第一天提供非劣效镇痛,同时显著减少局部麻醉药的使用。

试验注册

注册机构名称:中国临床试验注册中心;试验注册编号:ChiCTR2300074274;注册日期:2023 年 8 月 2 日。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36b4/11378376/997060b439da/13018_2024_5048_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验