Suppr超能文献

局部浸润麻醉与坐骨神经和收肌管阻滞用于快速通道膝关节置换术:一项随机对照临床试验。

Local infiltration anaesthesia versus sciatic nerve and adductor canal block for fast-track knee arthroplasty: A randomised controlled clinical trial.

出版信息

Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2019 Apr;36(4):255-263. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000929.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Local infiltration anaesthesia (LIA) was introduced as an innovative analgesic procedure for enhanced recovery after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, LIA has never been compared with analgesia based on an adductor canal catheter and a single-shot sciatic nerve block.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate two analgesic regimens for TKA comparing mobility, postoperative pain and patient satisfaction.

DESIGN

Two-group randomised, controlled clinical trial.

SETTING

Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Germany between April and August 2017.

PATIENTS

Adults undergoing primary TKA under general anaesthesia were eligible for study participation. Exclusion criteria were heart insufficiency (New York Heart Association class >2), liver insufficiency (Child Pugh Score >B), evidence of diabetic polyneuropathy, severe obesity (BMI > 40 kg m), chronic opioid therapy for more than 3 months before scheduled surgery and allergy to local anaesthetics.

INTERVENTIONS

Nerve block patients group (n=20) underwent surgery with two ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia blocks: a single-shot sciatic nerve block with 20 ml of ropivacaine 0.75% combined with an adductor canal block with a catheter placed for less than 4 days with an infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% at a rate of 6 ml h. LIA patients (LIA group, n=20) received LIA of the knee capsule at the end of surgery with 150 ml of ropivacaine 0.2%.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary endpoint was postoperative time to patient mobilisation (ability to walk) on the ward.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in each study group. Patients in both groups were mobilised to walk after TKA in similar time frames (LIA 24.0 h versus nerve block 27.1 h, 95% CI of difference -9.6 to 3.3 h). Maximum postoperative pain scores on exertion were higher in LIA patients with a mean 1.3 of 10 numerical rating scale points (95% CI 0.3 to 2.3, P = 0.010) as were intra-operative opioid requirements (LIA median 107 [IQR 100 to 268] mg versus nerve block median 78 [60 to 98] mg, P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction, postoperative oral morphine-equivalents and resting pain levels were comparable between groups. Anaesthesia induction time was reduced in LIA patients (LIA 10 min versus nerve block 35 min, 95% CI of difference 13 to 38 min, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Both analgesic regimens allow early mobilisation after TKA with high patient satisfaction. LIA shortened peri-operative time. Further research is required to optimise especially pain control during the later postoperative period with LIA.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier NCT03114306.

摘要

背景

局部浸润麻醉(LIA)作为一种新的镇痛方法,被引入用于增强初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)后的恢复。然而,LIA 从未与基于股神经导管和单次坐骨神经阻滞的镇痛进行过比较。

目的

评估两种用于 TKA 的镇痛方案,比较其在活动能力、术后疼痛和患者满意度方面的差异。

设计

两组随机对照临床试验。

地点

2017 年 4 月至 8 月在德国柏林夏洛蒂医科大学夏洛蒂校区进行。

患者

接受全身麻醉下初次 TKA 的成年人有资格参加研究。排除标准包括心功能不全(纽约心脏协会分级>2)、肝功能不全(Child Pugh 评分> B)、有糖尿病性多发性神经病的证据、严重肥胖(BMI>40kg/m)、术前 3 个月以上接受慢性阿片类药物治疗和对局部麻醉剂过敏。

干预

神经阻滞患者组(n=20)接受了两种超声引导下的区域麻醉阻滞:单次坐骨神经阻滞,使用 20ml 0.75%罗哌卡因,联合放置少于 4 天的股神经管阻滞,以 6ml/h 的速度输注 0.2%罗哌卡因。LIA 患者(LIA 组,n=20)在手术结束时接受膝关节囊内 LIA,使用 150ml 0.2%罗哌卡因。

主要观察指标

术后患者在病房内活动(行走能力)的时间是主要终点。

结果

两组患者的基线特征相似。两组患者在 TKA 后行走的时间相似(LIA 组为 24.0 小时,神经阻滞组为 27.1 小时,95%置信区间差值为-9.6 至 3.3 小时)。LIA 患者的最大术后用力疼痛评分较高,平均为 10 分数字评分量表(NRS)评分的 1.3 分(95%置信区间为 0.3 至 2.3,P=0.010),术中阿片类药物需求也较高(LIA 中位数 107[IQR 100 至 268]mg,神经阻滞中位数 78[60 至 98]mg,P<0.001)。两组患者的术后满意度、口服吗啡等效物和静息疼痛水平相当。LIA 患者的麻醉诱导时间缩短(LIA 组 10 分钟,神经阻滞组 35 分钟,95%置信区间差值为 13 至 38 分钟,P<0.001)。

结论

两种镇痛方案都能在 TKA 后早期活动,且患者满意度高。LIA 缩短了围手术期时间。需要进一步研究以优化 LIA 在术后后期的疼痛控制,尤其是疼痛控制。

临床试验注册

Clinicaltrials.gov 标识符 NCT03114306。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验