Suppr超能文献

多部位关节内注射透明质酸治疗患者的医疗利用和成本的回顾性索赔数据分析。

A retrospective claims data analysis of health care utilization and cost among patients receiving multi-injection intraarticular hyaluronic acid.

机构信息

Virginia Mason Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Seattle, WA.

Ferring Pharmaceuticals Inc, Parsippany, NJ.

出版信息

J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2024 Oct;30(10):1117-1127. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2024.30.10.1117.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

With the rising costs for knee arthroplasty, therapies that allow patients to avoid or delay surgery following knee osteoarthritis (KOA) may help in reducing overall health care costs. Multiple intraarticular hyaluronic acid (HA) products are available on the market, varying by formulation, molecular weight, and number of injections, but clinical and economic benefits may differ by product. To evaluate the all-cause and KOA-related health care resource utilization (HCRU) and costs among newly diagnosed patients with KOA treated with multi-injection HA.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using a large commercial claims database (Merative MarketScan database) to identify patients with KOA treated with high molecular weight (HMW) (n = 11,200), medium molecular weight (MMW) (n = 10,225), or low molecular weight (LMW) HAs (n = 8,473) between 2016 and 2019. KOA-related and all-cause HCRU and costs were compared within 12 months after the index HA treatment date. The association between outcomes and HA treatments was evaluated using a doubly robust method to adjust for confounding factors. HCRU and costs among the propensity score-weighted HA groups were compared using generalized linear models.

RESULTS

HMW HA patients were found to have lower adjusted KOA-related medical costs by $265.37 ( < 0.001) and pharmacy costs by $19.90 ( < 0.001) compared with LMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause total medical costs by $130.42 ( = 0.013) and pharmacy costs by $63.33 ( < 0.001). HMW HA patients also had a lower adjusted KOA-related medical cost by $205.74 ( < 0.001) and pharmacy cost by $14.39 ( < 0.001) compared with MMW HA patients, as well as lower all-cause medical by $1,195.66 ( < 0.001) and pharmacy by $196.99 ( < 0.001). Three-injection treatment patients (HMW HA, 84%; MMW HA, 82%) had high completion rate, compared with the 5-injection treatment cohort (LMW HA, 48%).

CONCLUSIONS

HMW HA patients had statistically significantly lower adjusted all-cause and KOA-related medical and pharmacy costs at 1 year follow-up compared with MMW HA and LMW HA patients. It is unclear if this is related to differences in molecular weight or specific mechanism of actions.

摘要

背景

随着膝关节置换术成本的上升,能够让膝骨关节炎(KOA)患者避免或推迟手术的疗法可能有助于降低整体医疗保健成本。市场上有多种关节内透明质酸(HA)产品,其配方、分子量和注射次数各不相同,但产品的临床和经济效益可能不同。本研究旨在评估接受多剂量 HA 治疗的新诊断 KOA 患者的全因和 KOA 相关医疗资源利用(HCRU)和成本。

方法

本研究使用大型商业索赔数据库(Merative MarketScan 数据库)进行回顾性队列研究,以确定 2016 年至 2019 年期间接受高分子量(HMW)(n=11200)、中分子量(MMW)(n=10225)或低分子量(LMW)HA 治疗的 KOA 患者(n=8473)。在接受 HA 治疗后 12 个月内比较 KOA 相关和全因 HCRU 和成本。使用双重稳健方法评估结局与 HA 治疗之间的关联,以调整混杂因素。使用广义线性模型比较倾向评分加权 HA 组之间的 HCRU 和成本。

结果

与 LMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者的调整后 KOA 相关医疗费用降低了 265.37 美元(<0.001),药房费用降低了 19.90 美元(<0.001),全因总医疗费用降低了 130.42 美元(=0.013),药房费用降低了 63.33 美元(<0.001)。与 MMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者的调整后 KOA 相关医疗费用降低了 205.74 美元(<0.001),药房费用降低了 14.39 美元(<0.001),全因医疗费用降低了 1195.66 美元(<0.001),药房费用降低了 196.99 美元(<0.001)。与 5 次注射治疗队列(LMW HA,48%)相比,接受 3 次注射治疗的患者(HMW HA,84%;MMW HA,82%)的完成率较高。

结论

与 MMW HA 和 LMW HA 患者相比,HMW HA 患者在 1 年随访时的全因和 KOA 相关医疗和药房费用调整后显著降低。这是否与分子量差异或特定作用机制有关尚不清楚。

相似文献

5
Knee OA cost comparison for hyaluronic acid and knee arthroplasty.
J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Aug 6;15(1):305. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-01848-7.
10
Is Intra-Articular Injection of Synvisc Associated with a Delay to Knee Arthroplasty in Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis?
Cartilage. 2019 Oct;10(4):423-431. doi: 10.1177/1947603518775792. Epub 2018 May 21.

本文引用的文献

1
Different molecular weights of hyaluronan research in knee osteoarthritis: A state-of-the-art review.
Matrix Biol. 2023 Mar;117:46-71. doi: 10.1016/j.matbio.2023.02.006. Epub 2023 Feb 26.
2
Impact of osteoarthritis disease severity on treatment patterns and healthcare resource use: analysis of real-world data.
Scand J Rheumatol. 2023 Jul;52(4):353-363. doi: 10.1080/03009742.2022.2058168. Epub 2022 May 19.
3
Global, regional prevalence, incidence and risk factors of knee osteoarthritis in population-based studies.
EClinicalMedicine. 2020 Nov 26;29-30:100587. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100587. eCollection 2020 Dec.
5
Hyperlipidemia and Statin Use on the Progression of Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.
Cureus. 2021 Jun 28;13(6):e15999. doi: 10.7759/cureus.15999. eCollection 2021 Jun.
6
Real-World Health Care Resource Utilization and Costs Among US Patients with Knee Osteoarthritis Compared with Controls.
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2021 May 21;13:421-435. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S302289. eCollection 2021.
9
Knee Osteoarthritis Treatment Costs in the Medicare Patient Population.
Am Health Drug Benefits. 2020 Sep;13(4):144-153.
10
Pain severity and healthcare resource utilization in patients with osteoarthritis in the United States.
Postgrad Med. 2021 Jan;133(1):10-19. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2020.1841988. Epub 2020 Dec 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验