Sezerol Mehmet Akif, Sarisaltik Alican
Epidemiology Program, Institute of Health Sciences, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Department of Public Health, School of Medicine, İstanbul Medipol University, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Ther Adv Vaccines Immunother. 2024 Sep 27;12:25151355241285375. doi: 10.1177/25151355241285375. eCollection 2024.
Immunization in the elderly population is critical due to the high frequency of health outcomes related to COVID-19.
This study aimed to compare the effectiveness levels of COVID-19 vaccine schedules in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection in the older adult group who received at least one booster dose.
Retrospective cohort study.
This study evaluated 8969 adults aged 65 and over in the Sultanbeyli district of İstanbul. COVID-19 vaccination and SARS-CoV-2 polymerase chain reaction testing data between January 14, 2021 and December 2, 2022 were obtained from the National Public Health Management System.
The median age of participants was 71 years. The vaccines were mostly administered as CoronaVac for the first and second doses (81.4% and 82.2%, respectively) and BNT162b2 for the third and fourth doses (61.8% and 73.1%, respectively). Turkovac was administered only in booster doses (third dose 0.6%, fourth dose 4.8%). The adjusted relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) was found to be 61.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 51.5-69.9) in two doses of inactivated vaccine and one dose of mRNA vaccine schedule compared to the homolog booster of CoronaVac primary vaccine schedule. In two booster doses receipts, the adjusted rVE was found to be 45.4% (95% CI 13.8-65.4) in three doses of inactivated and one dose mRNA vaccine schedule and 43.0% (95% CI 20.5-59.2) in two doses of inactivated and two doses of mRNA vaccines schedule compared to the two homolog boosters with CoronaVac primary vaccine schedule.
In this study, the effectiveness of the mRNA vaccine as a booster dose was higher than that of the homologous boosters in participants receiving the CoronaVac primary series for those aged 65 and over.
由于与新冠病毒相关的健康问题频发,老年人群的免疫接种至关重要。
本研究旨在比较至少接种一剂加强针的老年人群中,不同新冠疫苗接种方案在预防新冠病毒感染方面的有效性水平。
回顾性队列研究。
本研究评估了伊斯坦布尔苏丹贝利区8969名65岁及以上的成年人。2021年1月14日至2022年12月2日期间的新冠疫苗接种和新冠病毒聚合酶链反应检测数据来自国家公共卫生管理系统。
参与者的中位年龄为71岁。第一剂和第二剂疫苗大多接种科兴(分别为81.4%和82.2%),第三剂和第四剂大多接种BNT162b2(分别为61.8%和73.1%)。图尔克瓦克疫苗仅用于加强针(第三剂0.6%,第四剂4.8%)。与科兴初级疫苗接种方案的同源加强针相比,两剂灭活疫苗加一剂mRNA疫苗接种方案的调整后相对疫苗效力(rVE)为61.8%(95%置信区间(CI)51.5 - 69.9)。在接种两剂加强针的情况下,与科兴初级疫苗接种方案的两剂同源加强针相比,三剂灭活疫苗加一剂mRNA疫苗接种方案的调整后rVE为45.4%(95% CI 13.8 - 65.4),两剂灭活疫苗加两剂mRNA疫苗接种方案的调整后rVE为43.0%(95% CI 20.5 - 59.2)。
在本研究中,对于65岁及以上且接受科兴初级系列疫苗接种的参与者,mRNA疫苗作为加强针的效力高于同源加强针。