Kwon Do Yun, Kim Kwang-Ryeol, Kim Dong Hyuck, Kwak Sang Gyu
Department of Aviation Medical Squadron, Republic of Korea Air Force, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neurosurgery, Daegu Catholic University Medical Center, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Pain Pract. 2024 Oct 11;25(1). doi: 10.1111/papr.13424.
Gabapentinoids are commonly prescribed to control neuropathic pain of lumbar radiculopathy. Few trials have compared the efficacy of gabapentin (GBP) and pregabalin (PGB). Therefore, the authors conducted a meta-analysis to compare the difference in effect between GBP and PGB in lumbar radiculopathy patients.
Articles which were published between January 1, 1960 and May 31, 2023 were investigated via Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE. This meta-analysis was conducted on patients with lumbar radiculopathy. Gabapentin was used as an intervention, and pregabalin as a comparison. As outcomes, pain rating scales including visual analog scale (VAS) and numeric pain rating scale (NRS), and number of adverse events (dizziness and sedation) were obtained.
PGB showed statistically significant improvement in pain scale (VAS and NRS) in short-term follow-up (6 weeks or less) compared to GBP. (Total mean difference of -0.31) However, in the long-term follow-up (6 weeks to 12 weeks), there was no difference in pain reduction effect between two groups. The incidence of AEs showed no difference between two groups.
Based on this article, the existing evidence suggests that PGB was more effective in reducing pain of lumbar radiculopathy compared to GBP at the short-term follow-up, but there was no difference in the long-term follow-up. Physicians should consider this finding in prescribing medications for patients with lumbar radiculopathy.
加巴喷丁类药物常用于控制腰椎神经根病的神经性疼痛。很少有试验比较加巴喷丁(GBP)和普瑞巴林(PGB)的疗效。因此,作者进行了一项荟萃分析,以比较GBP和PGB对腰椎神经根病患者的疗效差异。
通过Cochrane对照试验中央登记库、Embase、谷歌学术和MEDLINE检索1960年1月1日至2023年5月31日发表的文章。本荟萃分析针对腰椎神经根病患者进行。以加巴喷丁作为干预措施,普瑞巴林作为对照。作为观察指标,获取疼痛评定量表,包括视觉模拟量表(VAS)和数字疼痛评定量表(NRS),以及不良事件(头晕和镇静)的数量。
与GBP相比,PGB在短期随访(6周或更短时间)的疼痛量表(VAS和NRS)上显示出统计学上的显著改善。(总平均差异为-0.31)然而,在长期随访(6周至12周)中,两组之间的疼痛减轻效果没有差异。两组不良事件的发生率没有差异。
基于本文,现有证据表明,在短期随访中,PGB在减轻腰椎神经根病疼痛方面比GBP更有效,但在长期随访中没有差异。医生在为腰椎神经根病患者开处方时应考虑这一发现。