Gu Li-Mei, Deng Can-Jin, Shang De-Wei, Huang Shan-Qing, Nie Sha, Yang Xin-Hu, Ning Yu-Ping, Huang Xing-Bing, Balbuena Lloyd, Xiang Yu-Tao, Zheng Wei
The Affiliated Brain Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China; Key Laboratory of Neurogenetics and Channelopathies of Guangdong Province and the Ministry of Education of China, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Department of Psychiatry, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada.
J Affect Disord. 2025 Feb 1;370:190-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2024.11.001. Epub 2024 Nov 2.
A few sham-controlled studies have examined the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) in adolescents with first-episode major depressive disorder (FE-MDD).
Forty adolescents (aged 13-17 years) with FE-MDD were randomly assigned to receive active rTMS (n = 20) or sham rTMS (n = 20) for 10 sessions over two weeks. The severity of baseline depressive symptoms and their improvement on the day immediately after the second, fourth, sixth, eighth, and tenth sessions were assessed with the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD-17).
After completing 10 rTMS treatment sessions, there was no significant difference in antidepressant response (70.0 % vs. 60.0 %, p > 0.05) and antidepressant remission (55.0 % vs. 35.0 %, p > 0.05) between rTMS groups. The linear mixed model analysis did not show a significant group-by-time interaction (F = 1.26; p > 0.05) in the HAMD-17 scores. There was a significant time main effect on the speed of processing (F = 13.61; p < 0.05), but this did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05). There were no other main effects and group-by-time interactions in the other MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery domains (all p > 0.05). All adverse event categories, such as fatigue and headache, were similar in the two groups (all p > 0.05).
In this study that compared a combination of LF-rTMS + medication with sham + medication, LF-rTMS had higher response and remission rates than a sham procedure in adolescents with FE-MDD, but the change was not statistically significant. LF-rTMS is generally safe, with mild adverse effects and no negative impact on neurocognitive performance for adolescents with FE-MDD.
ChiCTR2000037878.
少数假对照研究探讨了低频重复经颅磁刺激(LF-rTMS)治疗首发重度抑郁症(FE-MDD)青少年的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
40名年龄在13至17岁的FE-MDD青少年被随机分为两组,一组接受10次为期两周的真性rTMS治疗(n = 20),另一组接受假rTMS治疗(n = 20)。在第2、4、6、8和10次治疗后的次日,使用17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)评估基线抑郁症状的严重程度及其改善情况。
完成10次rTMS治疗后,rTMS组之间的抗抑郁反应(70.0%对60.0%,p>0.05)和抗抑郁缓解率(55.0%对[原文此处有误,应为35.0%]35.0%,p>0.05)无显著差异。线性混合模型分析显示,HAMD-17评分中不存在显著的组×时间交互作用(F = 1.26;p>0.05)。在处理速度方面存在显著的时间主效应(F = 13.61;p<0.05),但两组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。在其他MATRICS共识认知成套测验领域中,不存在其他主效应和组×时间交互作用(所有p>0.05)。两组中所有不良事件类别,如疲劳和头痛,均相似(所有p>0.05)。
在本研究中,将LF-rTMS+药物治疗与假刺激+药物治疗进行比较,LF-rTMS治疗FE-MDD青少年的反应率和缓解率高于假刺激治疗,但差异无统计学意义。LF-rTMS总体安全,不良反应轻微,对FE-MDD青少年的神经认知功能无负面影响。
ChiCTR2000037878。