Suppr超能文献

关于……灭活的方法

Approaches for the Inactivation of .

作者信息

Brady Amanda, Tomaszewski Maggie, Garrison Taylor M, Lawrenz Matthew B

机构信息

Department of Microbiology and Immunology; University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Center for Predictive Medicine for Biodefense and Emerging Infectious Diseases; University of Louisville School of Medicine, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

出版信息

Appl Biosaf. 2024 Dec 16;29(4):221-231. doi: 10.1089/apb.2023.0022. eCollection 2024 Dec.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

is the gram-negative, facultative intracellular bacterium that causes the disease known as plague. Due to the risk for aerosol transmission, a low infectious dose, and the acute and lethal nature of pneumonic plague, research activities with require Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3) facilities to provide the appropriate safeguards to minimize accidental exposures and environmental release. However, many experimental assays cannot be performed in BSL-3 due to equipment availability, and thus require removal of samples from the BSL-3 laboratory to be completed.

OBJECTIVES

To remove samples from BSL-3 containment and safely handle them at lower containment requires effective inactivation of any viable organisms from the samples prior to removal. While commonly used inactivation methods have been published for various select agents, there is an absence in the literature of a single source providing detailed examples for inactivation methods for . Our objective here is to provide examples of dose-dependent kill curves for commonly used inactivation approaches against

METHODS

Time- and dose-dependent kill curves using heat, methanol, and formaldehyde inactivation methods, and common nucleic acid extraction procedures.

RESULTS/CONCLUSIONS: We show data demonstrating the complete inactivation of using these methods. While not all-inclusive, this study provides data and examples that can be used by other researchers to develop their own in-house validated inactivation protocols for .

摘要

引言

[鼠疫杆菌]是一种革兰氏阴性兼性胞内细菌,可引发鼠疫。由于存在气溶胶传播风险、感染剂量低以及肺鼠疫的急性致死特性,针对[鼠疫杆菌]的研究活动需要生物安全3级(BSL-3)设施来提供适当的防护措施,以尽量减少意外暴露和环境释放。然而,由于设备可用性,许多实验分析无法在BSL-3中进行,因此需要将样本从BSL-3实验室取出才能完成。

目的

要从BSL-3级防护中取出样本并在较低防护级别下安全处理,需要在取出样本之前有效灭活样本中的任何活生物体。虽然已针对各种特定病原体公布了常用的灭活方法,但文献中缺乏一个单一来源提供针对[鼠疫杆菌]灭活方法的详细示例。我们在此的目的是提供针对[鼠疫杆菌]常用灭活方法的剂量依赖性杀灭曲线示例。

方法

采用加热、甲醇和甲醛灭活方法以及常见核酸提取程序的时间和剂量依赖性杀灭曲线。

结果/结论:我们展示的数据表明使用这些方法可使[鼠疫杆菌]完全灭活。虽然并非涵盖所有情况,但本研究提供的数据和示例可供其他研究人员用于制定他们自己内部验证的针对[鼠疫杆菌]的灭活方案。

原文中部分关键细菌名称未给出,用[鼠疫杆菌]等代替,以便呈现完整逻辑。实际翻译时应根据准确名称翻译。

相似文献

1
Approaches for the Inactivation of .
Appl Biosaf. 2024 Dec 16;29(4):221-231. doi: 10.1089/apb.2023.0022. eCollection 2024 Dec.
2
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
3
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.
4
Cost-effectiveness of using prognostic information to select women with breast cancer for adjuvant systemic therapy.
Health Technol Assess. 2006 Sep;10(34):iii-iv, ix-xi, 1-204. doi: 10.3310/hta10340.
5
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
6
Management of urinary stones by experts in stone disease (ESD 2025).
Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025 Jun 30;97(2):14085. doi: 10.4081/aiua.2025.14085.
9
10
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.

引用本文的文献

1
125 years of the plague in Brazil: lessons learnt, historical insights and contemporary challenges.
Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2025 Feb 24;120:e240220. doi: 10.1590/0074-02760240220. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
3
Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor Decontamination of Hazard Group 3 Bacteria and Viruses in a Biosafety Level 3 Laboratory.
Appl Biosaf. 2022 Mar 1;27(1):15-22. doi: 10.1089/apb.2021.0022. Epub 2022 Mar 15.
4
Plague risk in the western United States over seven decades of environmental change.
Glob Chang Biol. 2022 Feb;28(3):753-769. doi: 10.1111/gcb.15966. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
5
Yersiniabactin contributes to overcoming zinc restriction during infection of mammalian and insect hosts.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Nov 2;118(44). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104073118.
6
Production of inactivated gram-positive and gram-negative species with preserved cellular morphology and integrity.
J Microbiol Methods. 2021 May;184:106208. doi: 10.1016/j.mimet.2021.106208. Epub 2021 Mar 22.
7
Methods of Inactivation of SARS-CoV-2 for Downstream Biological Assays.
J Infect Dis. 2020 Oct 1;222(9):1462-1467. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jiaa507.
8
Specific Detection of Based on Receptor Binding Proteins of Phages.
Pathogens. 2020 Jul 27;9(8):611. doi: 10.3390/pathogens9080611.
9
Hazard Group 3 agent decontamination using hydrogen peroxide vapour in a class III microbiological safety cabinet.
J Appl Microbiol. 2020 Jan;128(1):116-123. doi: 10.1111/jam.14461. Epub 2019 Oct 31.
10
Formaldehyde and Glutaraldehyde Inactivation of Bacterial Tier 1 Select Agents in Tissues.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2019 May;25(5):919-926. doi: 10.3201/eid2505.180928. Epub 2019 May 17.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验