Norton Carter, Shaw Matthew Steven, Rubnitz Zachary, Smith Jarrod, Soares Heloisa P, Nevala-Plagemann Christopher D, Garrido-Laguna Ignacio, Florou Vaia
Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah Health Care, Salt Lake City.
McKusick-Nathans Institute of Genetic Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453588. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53588.
Despite the high prevalence of KRAS alterations in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), the clinical impact of common KRAS mutations with different cytotoxic regimens is unknown. This evidence is important to inform current treatment and provide a benchmark for emergent targeted KRAS therapies in metastatic PDAC.
To assess the clinical implications of common KRAS G12 mutations in PDAC and to compare outcomes of standard-of-care multiagent therapies across these common mutations.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study obtained deidentified clinical data for 5382 patients from a nationwide (US-based) clinicogenomic database. The deidentified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (approximately 800 sites of care). Patients diagnosed with metastatic PDAC from February 9, 2010, to September 20, 2022, and with sufficient follow-up and treatment data were included.
Median overall survival (OS) and time to next treatment (TTNT) were calculated for each KRAS mutation group. Hazard ratios (HRs) were generated using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models for KRAS mutations and mutation-treatment combinations.
A total of 2433 patients with PDAC were included in the analysis (mean age at first treatment, 67.0 [range, 66.0-68.0] years; 1340 male [55.1%]). Among 2023 patients with KRAS mutations, those with G12R had the longest median TTNT (6.0 [95% CI, 5.2-6.6] months) and the longest median OS (13.2 [95% CI, 10.6-15.2] months). Patients with KRAS G12D and G12V mutations had a significantly higher risk of disease progression (HRs, 1.15; [95% CI, 1.04-1.29; P = .009] and 1.16 [95% CI, 1.04-1.30; P = .01], respectively) and death (HRs, 1.29 [95% CI, 1.15-1.45; P < .001] and 1.23 [95% CI, 1.09-1.39; P < .001], respectively) compared with KRAS wild type. The FOLFIRINOX regimen (fluorouracil, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and leucovorin) had a significantly lower risk of treatment progression and death than gemcitabine with (HRs, 1.19 [95% CI, [1.09-1.29; P < .001] and 1.18 [95% CI, 1.07-1.29; P < .001], respectively) or without (HRs, 1.37 [95% CI, 1.11-1.69; P = .003] and 1.41 [95% CI 1.13-1.75; P = .002], respectively) nab-paclitaxel across all patients.
In this cohort study of 2433 patients with PDAC, KRAS G12D and G12V mutations were associated with worse patient outcomes compared with KRAS wild type. KRAS G12R was associated with more favorable patient outcomes, and FOLFIRINOX was associated with better patient outcomes than gemcitabine-based therapies. These findings highlight the need for more effective systemic therapies for these groups of patients.
尽管在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)中KRAS改变的发生率很高,但不同细胞毒性治疗方案下常见KRAS突变的临床影响尚不清楚。这一证据对于指导当前治疗以及为转移性PDAC中新兴的靶向KRAS疗法提供基准很重要。
评估PDAC中常见KRAS G12突变的临床意义,并比较这些常见突变的标准多药治疗方案的结果。
设计、设置和参与者:这项回顾性队列研究从一个全国性(美国)临床基因组数据库中获取了5382例患者的去识别化临床数据。这些去识别化数据来自约280家美国癌症诊所(约800个护理地点)。纳入了2010年2月9日至2022年9月20日期间诊断为转移性PDAC且有足够随访和治疗数据的患者。
计算每个KRAS突变组的中位总生存期(OS)和下次治疗时间(TTNT)。使用多变量Cox比例风险模型生成KRAS突变和突变-治疗组合的风险比(HRs)。
共有2433例PDAC患者纳入分析(首次治疗时的平均年龄为67.0岁[范围66.0 - 68.0岁];1340例男性[55.1%])。在2023例有KRAS突变的患者中,G12R突变患者的中位TTNT最长(6.0个月[95%CI,5.2 - 6.6个月]),中位OS最长(13.2个月[95%CI,10.6 - 15.2个月])。与KRAS野生型相比,KRAS G12D和G12V突变患者疾病进展风险显著更高(HRs分别为1.15[95%CI,1.04 - 1.29;P = 0.009]和1.16[95%CI,1.04 - 1.30;P = 0.01]),死亡风险也显著更高(HRs分别为1.29[95%CI,1.15 - 1.45;P < 0.001]和1.23[95%CI,1.09 - 1.39;P < 0.001])。在所有患者中,FOLFIRINOX方案(氟尿嘧啶、伊立替康、奥沙利铂和亚叶酸钙)与吉西他滨联合(HRs分别为1.19[95%CI,1.09 - 1.29;P < 0.001]和1.18[95%CI,1.07 - 1.29;P < 0.001])或不联合(HRs分别为1.37[95%CI,1.11 - 1.69;P = 0.003]和1.41[95%CI 1.13 - 1.75;P = 0.002])白蛋白结合型紫杉醇相比,治疗进展和死亡风险显著更低。
在这项对2433例PDAC患者的队列研究中,与KRAS野生型相比,KRAS G12D和G12V突变与更差的患者结局相关。KRAS G12R与更有利的患者结局相关,且FOLFIRINOX与基于吉西他滨的治疗相比,患者结局更好。这些发现凸显了为这些患者群体提供更有效全身治疗的必要性。