Suppr超能文献

半乳甘露聚糖化学发光免疫分析法在血液病患者血清中诊断肺曲霉病的多中心验证

Multicenter validation of a galactomannan chemiluminescence immunoassay for the diagnosis of pulmonary aspergillosis on serum of patients with hematological disease.

作者信息

Lamberink Hanne, Huygens Sammy, Aerts Robina, Lagrou Katrien, van Dijk Karin, Langerak Diana, Moors Ine, Boelens Jerina, Reynders Marijke, Maertens Johan, Schauwvlieghe Alexander, van Westreenen Mireille, Chong Ga-Lai M, Verweij Paul E, Buil Jochem B, Rijnders Bart J A

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

Department of Medical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.

出版信息

J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Feb 19;63(2):e0105324. doi: 10.1128/jcm.01053-24. Epub 2025 Jan 21.

Abstract

An accurate diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis (IA) in patients with underlying hematological malignancies relies heavily on galactomannan detection. In this study, we compared the VirCLIA chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) with the frequently used Platelia enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) on serum from hematology patients with suspected IA. Patients were categorized according to EORTC/MSGERC 2020 definitions into proven/probable IA and possible/no IA. The first cohort included 161 patients at four centers, and the VirCLIA manufacturer's cutoff of 0.200 was evaluated. Next, the optimal cutoff was determined using the Youden's index. In a second independent cohort of 189 patients from four centers, this optimal cutoff was evaluated again. In the first cohort, sensitivities and specificities for probable/proven IA were 21.1% and 100.0% for ELISA (1.0 cutoff) and 36.6% and 95.6% (0.5 cutoff), compared to 11.3% and 97.8% for CLIA (0.200 cutoff). In the second cohort, the sensitivities of ELISA and CLIA were comparable (ELISA ≥ 1.0: 33.3%, CLIA ≥ 0.200: 38.1%). The area under the ROC curve was lower for CLIA than for ELISA in the first cohort (65.0% vs 78.7%, = 0.005) but comparable in the second cohort (79.5% vs 81.3%, = 0.649). Youden's index identified 0.100 as the optimal CLIA cutoff with sensitivities of 35.2% and 61.9% in cohorts 1 and 2, respectively, at slightly reduced specificities of 85.6% and 90.5%. While the sensitivity of both assays was low to moderate at best, in patients with a high pre-test probability, we suggest 0.100 as the cutoff for the VirCLIA assay.IMPORTANCEThis study demonstrates a comparable performance of the novel chemiluminescence immunoassay (CLIA) and the conventionally used enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for galactomannan serum testing in hematological patients at high risk for invasive aspergillosis. In patients with a high pre-test probability, a lower CLIA cutoff of 0.100 is preferred.

摘要

对患有潜在血液系统恶性肿瘤的患者进行侵袭性曲霉病(IA)的准确诊断在很大程度上依赖于半乳甘露聚糖检测。在本研究中,我们将VirCLIA化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)与血液科疑似IA患者血清中常用的普立泰酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)进行了比较。根据欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织/侵袭性真菌感染协作组(EORTC/MSGERC)2020年的定义,将患者分为确诊/很可能的IA以及可能/无IA。第一个队列包括来自四个中心的161名患者,并对VirCLIA制造商设定的0.200临界值进行了评估。接下来,使用约登指数确定最佳临界值。在来自四个中心的189名患者组成的第二个独立队列中,再次对该最佳临界值进行了评估。在第一个队列中,ELISA(临界值为1.0)对很可能/确诊IA的敏感性和特异性分别为21.1%和100.0%,(临界值为0.5时)为36.6%和95.6%,而CLIA(临界值为0.200)的敏感性和特异性分别为11.3%和97.8%。在第二个队列中,ELISA和CLIA的敏感性相当(ELISA≥1.0:33.3%,CLIA≥0.200:38.1%)。在第一个队列中,CLIA的ROC曲线下面积低于ELISA(65.0%对78.7%,P = 0.005),但在第二个队列中相当(79.5%对81.3%,P = 0.649)。约登指数确定0.100为CLIA的最佳临界值,在队列1和队列2中的敏感性分别为35.2%和61.9%,特异性略有降低,分别为85.6%和90.5%。虽然两种检测方法的敏感性充其量都处于低到中等水平,但对于预测试验概率高的患者,我们建议将0.100作为VirCLIA检测的临界值。

重要性

本研究表明,在侵袭性曲霉病高危血液科患者中,新型化学发光免疫分析(CLIA)和传统使用的酶联免疫吸附测定在半乳甘露聚糖血清检测方面具有相当的性能。对于预测试验概率高的患者,较低的CLIA临界值0.100更可取。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/bcac/11837514/e6fdcaf5df89/jcm.01053-24.f001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验