Suppr超能文献

多种微管解聚药物在内皮细胞中诱导相同的分子途径反应。

Diverse microtubule-destabilizing drugs induce equivalent molecular pathway responses in endothelial cells.

作者信息

Horin Lillian J, Sonnett Matthew, Li Boyan, Mitchison Timothy J

机构信息

Department of Systems Biology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115.

出版信息

bioRxiv. 2025 Jan 24:2025.01.22.632572. doi: 10.1101/2025.01.22.632572.

Abstract

Drugs that modulate microtubule (MT) dynamics are well-characterized at the molecular level, yet the mechanisms linking these molecular effects to their distinct clinical outcomes remain unclear. Several MT-destabilizing drugs, including vinblastine, combretastatin A4, and plinabulin, are widely used, or are under evaluation for cancer treatment. Although all three depolymerize MTs, they do so through distinct biochemical mechanisms. Furthermore, their clinical profiles and therapeutic uses differ considerably. To investigate whether differential modulation of molecular pathways might account for clinical differences, we compared gene expression and signaling pathway responses in human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs), alongside the MT-stabilizing drug docetaxel and the pro-inflammatory cytokine TNF-α. RNA-sequencing and phosphoproteomics revealed that all three MT destabilizers triggered equivalent molecular responses. The substantial changes in gene expression caused by MT destabilization were completely dependent on Rho family GTPase activation. These findings suggest that the distinct clinical profiles of the destabilizing drugs depend on differences in pharmacokinetics (PK) and tissue distribution rather than molecular actions. The washout rate of the three drugs differed, which likely translates to PK differences. Our data provide insights into how MT destabilization triggers signaling changes, potentially explaining how these drugs induce cell cycle re-entry in quiescent cells and how plinabulin ameliorates chemotherapy-induced neutropenia.

摘要

调节微管(MT)动力学的药物在分子水平上已得到充分表征,但其将这些分子效应与不同临床结果联系起来的机制仍不清楚。几种MT破坏稳定药物,包括长春碱、康普瑞汀A4和普利纳布林,已被广泛使用或正在接受癌症治疗评估。尽管这三种药物都能使MT解聚,但它们通过不同的生化机制实现。此外,它们的临床特征和治疗用途差异很大。为了研究分子途径的差异调节是否可能解释临床差异,我们比较了人肺微血管内皮细胞(HPMEC)中基因表达和信号通路反应,同时使用了MT稳定药物多西他赛和促炎细胞因子TNF-α。RNA测序和磷酸化蛋白质组学表明,所有三种MT破坏稳定药物都引发了相同的分子反应。MT破坏稳定导致的基因表达的显著变化完全依赖于Rho家族GTP酶的激活。这些发现表明,破坏稳定药物的不同临床特征取决于药代动力学(PK)和组织分布的差异,而非分子作用。这三种药物的洗脱速率不同,这可能导致PK差异。我们的数据为MT破坏稳定如何触发信号变化提供了见解,这可能解释了这些药物如何诱导静止细胞重新进入细胞周期以及普利纳布林如何改善化疗引起的中性粒细胞减少症。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/551e/11785092/2dfb327154a0/nihpp-2025.01.22.632572v1-f0001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验