Liang Xiaojie, Luo Baiwei, Lin Bingyu, Liu Dan, Guo Jia, Lu Weixiang, Tian Shengyu, Cai Zihong, Zhou Xinyu, Jin Zhihao, Li Tong, Chen Keren, Zhou Hongsheng, Wang Liang
Department of Hematology, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Department of Hematology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
J Immunother Cancer. 2025 Apr 5;13(4):e011200. doi: 10.1136/jitc-2024-011200.
The risk of secondary primary malignancies (SPMs) associated with bispecific antibody (BsAb)-a promising alternative to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T therapy-remains insufficiently explored.
Using large-scale, real-world data from the US Food and Drug Administration's Adverse Event Reporting System, we identified the relative frequency and characteristics of SPMs following BsAbs therapy and conducted a comprehensive comparison of treatment-related SPM profiles between BsAbs and CAR-T therapies.
We identified 108 cases among 10,280 BsAb-treated patients. The incidence risk of SPMs was stable over the past 8 years, accounting for 1-2% of all adverse events, with a case fatality rate of 29.63% among the SPM cases. Myeloid leukemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were more frequent in blinatumomab recipients, while solid malignancies predominated in those treated with teclistamab. Time-to-onset (TTO) was significantly shorter in BsAb recipients compared with non-recipients, with weight and treatment duration influencing TTO, while no significant differences in TTO were observed across different BsAb products, ages, and genders. Our findings highlight the first year of BsAbs as a critical window for early detection and intervention. Although the overall risk of SPMs was lower with BsAbs than with CAR-T, the outcomes of SPMs were comparable in both groups. TTO and SPM patterns were statistically similar between the two therapies.
Our study provides the first detailed characterization of SPMs post-BsAb, underscoring the need for continued pharmacovigilance and individualized risk management to mitigate SPM risks in patients undergoing BsAb therapy.
与双特异性抗体(BsAb)相关的继发性原发性恶性肿瘤(SPM)风险——嵌合抗原受体(CAR)-T疗法的一种有前景的替代方案——仍未得到充分探索。
利用来自美国食品药品监督管理局不良事件报告系统的大规模真实世界数据,我们确定了BsAb治疗后SPM的相对频率和特征,并对BsAb和CAR-T疗法之间与治疗相关的SPM概况进行了全面比较。
我们在10280例接受BsAb治疗的患者中确定了108例病例。在过去8年中,SPM的发病风险保持稳定,占所有不良事件的1%-2%,在SPM病例中的病死率为29.63%。在接受blinatumomab治疗的患者中,髓系白血病和非霍奇金淋巴瘤更为常见,而在用teclistamab治疗的患者中实体恶性肿瘤占主导。与未接受BsAb治疗的患者相比,接受BsAb治疗的患者的发病时间(TTO)显著缩短,体重和治疗持续时间会影响TTO,而在不同的BsAb产品、年龄和性别之间未观察到TTO的显著差异。我们的研究结果突出了BsAb治疗的第一年是早期检测和干预的关键窗口期。虽然BsAb治疗的SPM总体风险低于CAR-T治疗,但两组中SPM的结局具有可比性。两种疗法之间的TTO和SPM模式在统计学上相似。
我们的研究首次详细描述了BsAb治疗后的SPM,强调需要持续进行药物警戒和个体化风险管理,以降低接受BsAb治疗患者的SPM风险。