Suppr超能文献

激素受体乳腺癌亚型中乳腺癌风险因素的因果效应:一项两样本孟德尔随机化研究

Causal Effects of Breast Cancer Risk Factors across Hormone Receptor Breast Cancer Subtypes: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

作者信息

Verdiesen Renée M G, Shokouhi Mehrnoosh, Burgess Stephen, Canisius Sander, Chang-Claude Jenny, Bojesen Stig E, Schmidt Marjanka K

机构信息

Division of Molecular Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.

The Medical Research Council (MRC) Biostatistics Unit, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2025 Jun 3;34(6):933-943. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-1440.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

It is unclear if established breast cancer risk factors exert similar causal effects across hormone receptor breast cancer subtypes. We estimated and compared causal estimates of height, body mass index (BMI), type 2 diabetes, age at menarche, age at menopause, breast density, alcohol consumption, regular smoking, and physical activity across these subtypes.

METHODS

We used a two-sample Mendelian randomization approach and selected genetic instrumental variables from large-scale genome-wide association studies. Publicly available summary-level Breast Cancer Association Consortium data (n = 247,173; 133,384 cases, 113,789 controls) for the following subtypes were included: luminal A-like (45,253 cases), luminal B-/HER2-negative-like (6,350 cases), luminal B-like (6,427 cases), HER2-enriched (2,884 cases), and triple-negative (8,602 cases). We employed multiple Mendelian randomization methods to evaluate the strength of causal evidence for each risk factor-subtype association.

RESULTS

Collectively, our analyses indicated that increased height and decreased BMI are probable causal risk factors for all five subtypes. For the other risk factors, the strength of evidence for causal effects differed across subtypes. Heterogeneity in the magnitude of causal effect estimates for age at menopause and breast density was explained by null findings for triple-negative tumors. Regular smoking was the sole risk factor for which there was no evidence of a causal effect on any subtype.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that established breast cancer risk factors differ across hormone receptor subtypes.

IMPACT

Our results are valuable for the development of primary prevention strategies, improvement of breast cancer risk stratification in the general population, and identification of novel breast cancer risk factors.

摘要

背景

目前尚不清楚既定的乳腺癌风险因素在激素受体乳腺癌亚型中是否具有相似的因果效应。我们估计并比较了身高、体重指数(BMI)、2型糖尿病、初潮年龄、绝经年龄、乳腺密度、饮酒、经常吸烟和身体活动在这些亚型中的因果效应估计值。

方法

我们采用两样本孟德尔随机化方法,并从大规模全基因组关联研究中选择基因工具变量。纳入了以下亚型的公开汇总水平的乳腺癌协会联盟数据(n = 247,173;133,384例病例,113,789例对照):腔面A型(45,253例病例)、腔面B-/HER2阴性型(6,350例病例)、腔面B型(6,427例病例)、HER2富集型(2,884例病例)和三阴性型(8,602例病例)。我们采用多种孟德尔随机化方法来评估每个风险因素与亚型关联的因果证据强度。

结果

总体而言,我们的分析表明,身高增加和BMI降低可能是所有五种亚型的因果风险因素。对于其他风险因素,因果效应的证据强度在不同亚型之间有所不同。绝经年龄和乳腺密度因果效应估计值大小的异质性可通过三阴性肿瘤的阴性结果来解释。经常吸烟是唯一一个对任何亚型均无因果效应证据的风险因素。

结论

本研究表明,既定的乳腺癌风险因素在激素受体亚型之间存在差异。

影响

我们的结果对于制定一级预防策略、改善一般人群中的乳腺癌风险分层以及识别新的乳腺癌风险因素具有重要价值。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验