Suppr超能文献

自体移植或CAR-T作为挽救治疗后缓解的MYC重排大B细胞淋巴瘤患者巩固治疗的选择

Autologous Transplant or CAR-T as Consolidation Options in MYC Rearranged Large B-Cell Lymphoma Patients in Remission After Salvage Treatments.

作者信息

Furqan Fateeha, Ahn Kwang W, Kaur Manmeet, Patel Jinalben, Ansell Stephen, Awan Farrukh T, Baird John, Bezerra Evandro, Farooq Umar, Fung Henry, Khurana Arushi, Lekakis Lazaros, Lutfi Forat, McCarty John, Mukherjee Akash, Nath Rajneesh, Romancik Jason, Schuster Stephen J, Smith Melody, Winter Allison, Turtle Cameron, Sauter Craig, Shadman Mazyar, Herrara Alex, Hamadani Mehdi

机构信息

BMT & Cellular Therapy Program, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research, Department of Medicine, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

Am J Hematol. 2025 Jul;100(7):1152-1162. doi: 10.1002/ajh.27687. Epub 2025 Apr 15.

Abstract

Although recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy in relapsed large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) with MYC rearrangement (R-MYC), the data comparing CAR-T to autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (auto-HCT) in such patients who achieve a complete or partial response (CR/PR) after salvage therapies are limited. We compared the clinical outcomes of patients with R-MYC LBCL (including double and triple hit lymphomas) who underwent CAR-T or auto-HCT after achieving a CR/PR with salvage therapies using the Center for International Blood & Marrow Transplant Research registry. Among the 252 patients (auto-HCT = 98, CAR-T = 154), relative to auto-HCT, CAR-T was associated with significantly lower overall survival (OS) (Hazard Ratio [HR] 2.09, 95% CI 1.38-3.15, p < 0.001) on multivariate analysis. There were no differences in progression-free survival (PFS) (HR 1.21, 95% CI 0.81-1.8 p = 0.36), risk of relapse (HR 1.1, 95% CI 0.71-1.69 p = 0.68), nonrelapse mortality (NRM) (HR 1.74, 95% CI 0.64-4.7 p = 0.28) while the post-relapse survival was longer in auto-HCT relative to CAR-T (HR 1.93, 95% CI 1.21-3.06 p = 0.01). On propensity score matched analysis accounting for differences in characteristics across the two cohorts, we detected no significant differences in OS (HR 1.72, 95% CI 0.92-3.21 p = 0.09), PFS (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.64-1.68 p = 0.88), NRM (HR 1.22, 95% CI 0.35-4.2 p = 0.76), relapse (HR = 0.93, 95% CI 0.54-1.6 p = 0.8) and post-relapse survival (HR 2.25, 95% CI 0.98-5.17, p = 0.06). These data, although retrospective, support consideration for auto-HCT in patients with R-MYC LBCL who achieve a CR/PR after salvage therapies, particularly in regions with no or limited access to CAR-T.

摘要

尽管最近的研究已证明嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)疗法在复发的伴有MYC重排(R-MYC)的大B细胞淋巴瘤(LBCL)中具有疗效,但在接受挽救性治疗后获得完全或部分缓解(CR/PR)的此类患者中,比较CAR-T与自体造血细胞移植(auto-HCT)的数据有限。我们使用国际血液与骨髓移植研究中心的登记数据,比较了接受挽救性治疗后达到CR/PR后接受CAR-T或auto-HCT的R-MYC LBCL患者(包括双打击和三打击淋巴瘤)的临床结局。在252例患者中(auto-HCT = 98例,CAR-T = 154例),多因素分析显示,相对于auto-HCT,CAR-T与显著更低的总生存期(OS)相关(风险比[HR] 2.09,95%置信区间1.38 - 3.15,p < 0.001)。无进展生存期(PFS)(HR 1.21,95%置信区间0.81 - 1.8,p = 0.36)、复发风险(HR 1.1,95%置信区间0.71 - 1.69,p = 0.68)、非复发死亡率(NRM)(HR 1.74,95%置信区间0.64 - 4.7,p = 0.28)方面无差异,而auto-HCT相对于CAR-T的复发后生存期更长(HR 1.93,95%置信区间1.21 - 3.06,p = 0.01)。在考虑两个队列特征差异的倾向评分匹配分析中,我们未检测到OS(HR 1.72,95%置信区间0.92 - 3.21,p = 0.09)、PFS(HR 1.04,95%置信区间0.64 - 1.68,p = 0.88)、NRM(HR 1.22,95%置信区间0.35 - 4.2,p = 0.76)、复发(HR = 0.93,95%置信区间0.54 - 1.6,p = 0.8)和复发后生存期(HR 2.25,95%置信区间0.98 - 5.17,p = 0.06)存在显著差异。这些数据虽然是回顾性的,但支持在接受挽救性治疗后达到CR/PR的R-MYC LBCL患者中考虑auto-HCT,特别是在无法获得或获得CAR-T受限的地区。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验