Kok Car Reen, Thissen James B, Cerroni Michele, Tribble David R, Cancio Anthony, Tran Sophia, Schofield Christina, Colombo Rhonda E, Troth Tom, Joya Christie, Lalani Tahaniyat, Be Nicholas A
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California, USA.
Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, , Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
mSphere. 2025 Jun 25;10(6):e0081824. doi: 10.1128/msphere.00818-24. Epub 2025 May 15.
Field expedient devices and protocols for the collection, storage, and shipment of stool samples in deployed settings are needed for the advancement of microbiome research in military health. Relevant assessments include the evaluation of microbiome signatures associated with susceptibility to travelers' diarrhea and recovery of gut function following infection. However, inherent biases in microbial measurements due to preservatives and sampling methods are unclear and should be assessed for an accurate evaluation of the microbiome. We performed shotgun metagenomic sequencing and compared the microbiome composition in paired fecal samples collected using Flinters Technology Associates (FTA) cards and OMNIgene (OG) Gut tubes, prior to and during international travel, from 49 adult participants, 39 of whom remained asymptomatic and 10 experienced travelers' diarrhea. Higher concentrations of nucleic acid and sequencing libraries were observed in OG samples. A majority of genera (82.9%) were detected with both methods, and detections of genera limited to one collection method were not highly prevalent across samples and were present in extremely low relative abundances (<0.01%). Differences in beta diversity were largely explained by inter-individuality of microbiome composition, followed by the effect of collection method and timepoint-disease states. Differential abundance analysis indicated that and were consistently higher in abundance across all groups with FTA and OG collection, respectively. The observed differences in microbiome composition between methods suggest the need for consistent and standardized protocols within a study. Overall, the data presented here could help guide the future design of fecal microbiome study protocols in field and military deployment settings.IMPORTANCEThe assessment of field-deployable methods for fecal sample collection and storage is required to reliably capture samples collected in remote and austere locations. This study describes a comparative metagenomics analysis between samples collected by two different commercially available methods in a military-deployed setting. The results presented here are foundational for the future design of fecal microbiome study protocols in an operational context.
为推进军事健康领域的微生物组研究,需要在部署环境中使用的用于粪便样本采集、储存和运输的现场应急设备及方案。相关评估包括对与旅行者腹泻易感性相关的微生物组特征的评估以及感染后肠道功能的恢复情况。然而,由于防腐剂和采样方法导致的微生物测量中固有的偏差尚不清楚,应进行评估以准确评估微生物组。我们进行了鸟枪法宏基因组测序,并比较了49名成年参与者在国际旅行前和旅行期间使用弗林特斯技术协会(FTA)卡和全基因(OG)肠道管采集的配对粪便样本中的微生物组组成,其中39人无症状,10人经历了旅行者腹泻。在OG样本中观察到更高浓度的核酸和测序文库。两种方法均检测到大多数属(82.9%),仅限于一种采集方法检测到的属在样本中并不普遍,且相对丰度极低(<0.01%)。β多样性的差异在很大程度上由微生物组组成的个体间差异解释,其次是采集方法和时间点-疾病状态的影响。差异丰度分析表明,在所有使用FTA和OG采集的组中, 和 的丰度分别始终较高。方法之间观察到的微生物组组成差异表明,研究中需要一致且标准化的方案。总体而言,此处呈现的数据有助于指导未来在野外和军事部署环境中进行粪便微生物组研究方案的设计。重要性为了可靠地采集在偏远和艰苦地点收集的样本,需要评估用于粪便样本采集和储存的可现场部署方法。本研究描述了在军事部署环境中通过两种不同商业可用方法采集的样本之间的比较宏基因组学分析。此处呈现的结果是在实际操作背景下未来设计粪便微生物组研究方案的基础。