Liu Xiao-Qiang, Qi Yang-Yang, Huang Tao, Huang Li-Li, Zhao Ming-Xuan, Wang Zhong-Fang, Dai Jun, Wang Yan-Xia, Chen Jing-Jing, Yang Xiao-Yun, Fan Hui-Lan, Yan Xue-Mei, He Jian-Chang, Zou Yan-Xiang, Jiang Zhi-Wei, Zhan Zhi-Fei, Tao Si-Wen, Dai De-Fang, Shi Feng, Zhang Qiong-Na, Yang Xiu-Liang, Li Xiao-Zhong, Li Wei, Lu Jing, Zheng Jiang-Bing, Zhang Zhi-Hua, Chen Gao-Xiang, Su Hong, Gao Wei-Min, Seidlein Lorenz von, Wang Xuan-Yi, Yuan Lin, Lin Jin-Zhong
Immunization Planning Unit, Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Kunming, People's Republic of China.
Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Hum Vaccin Immunother. 2025 Dec;21(1):2502250. doi: 10.1080/21645515.2025.2502250. Epub 2025 May 16.
A randomized, double-blind, controlled phase 3 trial was conducted during a COVID-19 outbreak after the initial, stringent zero-Covid policy was relaxed in three provinces. Eligible adults aged ≥18 years who had received three doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines 6 months earlier were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either one intramuscular injection of RQ3013 or ZF2001 vaccine. The primary end point was protection against PCR-confirmed symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection with onset at least 7 days after the booster. A total of 3,167 and 3,169 eligible participants received one dose of RQ3013 or ZF2001 vaccine, respectively. COVID-19 illness was confirmed in 91 participants in the ZF2001 group (11.8 per 100 person years; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.6-14.6) and in 45 participants in the RQ3013 group (5.7 per 100 person-years; 95% CI: 4.3-7.7) during a 4-month follow-up, resulting in a relative efficacy of 51.7% (95% CI, 30.9-66.2%) ( < .001) in an intention-to-treat analysis. The RQ3013 vaccine was also found to be significantly more immunogenic against omicron BA.5 compared to the ZF2001 vaccine. Moderate, transient adverse reaction after vaccination occurred more frequently in the RQ3013 group than in the ZF2001 group. Serious adverse events (SAEs) were rare and occurred almost equally in two groups. All SAEs were not related to the vaccination. These findings suggest that a chimeric mRNA vaccine design involving multiple antigenic epitopes provides broader protection across subvariants and variants of SARS-CoV-2 than the subunit vaccine ZF2001.
在三个省份放宽最初严格的“动态清零”政策后,在新冠疫情期间开展了一项随机、双盲、对照3期试验。年龄≥18岁、6个月前已接种三剂新冠灭活疫苗的符合条件的成年人,按1:1的比例随机分配,接受一次肌肉注射RQ3013或ZF2001疫苗。主要终点是预防加强免疫至少7天后经聚合酶链反应(PCR)确诊的有症状的严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染。共有3167名和3169名符合条件的参与者分别接受了一剂RQ3013或ZF2001疫苗。在4个月的随访期间,ZF2001组有91名参与者确诊感染新冠(每100人年11.8例;95%置信区间[CI]:9.6-14.6),RQ3013组有45名参与者确诊感染(每100人年5.7例;95%CI:4.3-7.7),在意向性分析中的相对疗效为51.7%(95%CI,30.9-66.2%)(P<0.001)。还发现,与ZF2001疫苗相比,RQ3013疫苗对奥密克戎BA.5的免疫原性明显更强。接种疫苗后中度、短暂的不良反应在RQ3013组比在ZF2001组更频繁出现。严重不良事件(SAE)很少见,两组发生情况几乎相同。所有严重不良事件均与疫苗接种无关。这些研究结果表明,与亚单位疫苗ZF2001相比,涉及多个抗原表位的嵌合信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗设计对SARS-CoV-2的亚变体和变体提供了更广泛的保护。