Suppr超能文献

一线替雷利珠单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗治疗晚期食管鳞状细胞癌的成本效益分析

First-line toripalimab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A cost-effectiveness analysis.

作者信息

Han Jing-Wen, Zhong Yu, Zhong Jin, Zeng Wen-Jing, Sun Li-Jun

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

Department of Pharmacy, National Regional Medical Center, Binhai Campus of the First Affiliated Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2025 Jun 10;20(6):e0325808. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0325808. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of toripalimab combined with chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as a first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) from the perspective of U.S. healthcare payers.

METHODS

A 10-year partitioned survival model was developed using survival data from the JUPITER-06 clinical trial (NCT03829969). Costs included only direct medical expenses, and health utility values were derived from published literature. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to assess the robustness of the model.

RESULTS

Toripalimab combined with chemotherapy incurred an incremental cost of $64,483.3 and achieved an incremental effectiveness of 0.53 quality-adjusted life-years (QALY) compared to chemotherapy alone, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $122,771.67 per QALY. This ICER is below the willingness-to-pay threshold in the United States ($150,000). The model results were sensitive to the cost of toripalimab and the utility values of both progression-free and progressed disease states.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings indicate that toripalimab combined with chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced ESCC in the United States provides a cost-effective benefit in comparison to chemotherapy alone.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在从美国医疗保健支付者的角度评估托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗与单纯化疗作为晚期食管鳞状细胞癌(ESCC)一线治疗方案的成本效益。

方法

利用JUPITER - 06临床试验(NCT03829969)的生存数据建立了一个10年的分区生存模型。成本仅包括直接医疗费用,健康效用值来自已发表的文献。进行了单向和概率敏感性分析以评估模型的稳健性。

结果

与单纯化疗相比,托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗产生了64,483.3美元的增量成本,并实现了0.53个质量调整生命年(QALY)的增量效果,导致每QALY的增量成本效益比(ICER)为122,771.67美元。该ICER低于美国的支付意愿阈值(150,000美元)。模型结果对托瑞帕利单抗的成本以及无进展和疾病进展状态的效用值敏感。

结论

研究结果表明,在美国,托瑞帕利单抗联合化疗作为晚期ESCC的一线治疗方案与单纯化疗相比具有成本效益优势。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/dcb7/12151424/e403e576e0e3/pone.0325808.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验