Klugherz Isabel, Kölli Bettina, Reinmüller Moritz, Willinger Birgit, Leitner Eva, Steinmetz Ivo, Dichtl Karl
Diagnostic and Research Institute of Hygiene, Microbiology and Environmental Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Division of Clinical Microbiology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Mycoses. 2025 Jun;68(6):e70078. doi: 10.1111/myc.70078.
Identification of filamentous fungi still poses a major challenge to laboratories. Matrix assisted laser desorption/ionisation time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is a promising tool, since it offers low-cost and fast results. Different MALDI-TOF MS systems are available for routine laboratories. This is a comprehensive head-to-head comparison of three devices and the respective reference spectrum databases.
A set of 77 pre-characterised isolates of filamentous fungi was measured (in duplicates) parallelly with three MALDI-TOF MS systems after 24 h, 48 h and 72 h of incubation: (1) Biotyper smart ('BT', Bruker Daltonics),(2) EXS2600 ('EXS', Zybio) and (3) VITEK MS PRIME ('VITEK', bioMérieux).
After three measurements, no valid results at the species level ('green category') were obtained for 18%, 21% and 14% of isolates by BT, EXS and VITEK. Depending on the MALDI-TOF MS system, validity rates ranged from 58%-82% for the different time points. Correct and valid results were obtained for 82%, 73% and 81% of isolates by BT, EXS and VITEK. BT was the system that required the most duplicate measurements. EXS displayed the highest rate of misidentification events. VITEK had the highest rate of unidentified isolates, which were featured within its database.
Based on our experience, all three devices proved to be suitable for routine diagnostics. The timepoint of measurement had a major impact on the quality of analysis and should be considered by the user. Lowering the validity cut-off levels might increase the performance of the EXS system.
丝状真菌的鉴定对实验室来说仍然是一项重大挑战。基质辅助激光解吸/电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)是一种很有前景的工具,因为它成本低且结果快速。不同的MALDI-TOF MS系统可供常规实验室使用。这是对三种仪器及其各自参考光谱数据库进行的全面的直接比较。
一组77株预先鉴定的丝状真菌分离株在培养24小时、48小时和72小时后,使用三种MALDI-TOF MS系统平行测量(一式两份):(1)Biotyper smart(“BT”,布鲁克道尔顿公司),(2)EXS2600(“EXS”,珠海迪尔生物工程股份有限公司)和(3)VITEK MS PRIME(“VITEK”,生物梅里埃公司)。
经过三次测量后,BT、EXS和VITEK分别有18%、21%和14%的分离株在种水平(“绿色类别”)未获得有效结果。根据MALDI-TOF MS系统的不同,不同时间点的有效率在58%-82%之间。BT、EXS和VITEK分别对82%、73%和81%的分离株获得了正确有效的结果。BT是需要重复测量次数最多的系统。EXS显示出最高的错误鉴定率。VITEK在其数据库中的未鉴定分离株率最高。
根据我们的经验,这三种仪器都被证明适用于常规诊断。测量时间点对分析质量有重大影响,用户应予以考虑。降低有效截止水平可能会提高EXS系统的性能。