Bosserman Rachel E, Tarlton Nicole J, Alvarado Kelly, Roemmich Brittany, Yarbrough Melanie L
Department of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 2025 Jun 20:e0021125. doi: 10.1128/jcm.00211-25.
Matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) is widely used for rapid identification of bacteria and yeast in clinical labs. The VITEK MS PRIME ("PRIME") is the latest MALDI-TOF MS system from bioMérieux. This study evaluated PRIME's performance and workflow timing against the MALDI Biotyper CA System by Bruker ("Biotyper"). We compared a collection of 154 bacteria and yeast clinical isolates from various specimen types using three methods: Biotyper target with a toothpick, PRIME target with the PICKME nib, and PRIME target with a loop. Positive blood culture isolates were also analyzed using these methods, with high-experience (HEU, = 300) and low-experience users (LEU, = 50) after short (6-8 h) and routine (18-24 h) incubation on agar plates. Workflow timing, from sample processing to organism identification, was assessed to identify time savings. PRIME identified 96% (PICKME) and 95% (Loop) of challenge isolates to genus level, compared with Biotyper at 99%. Short incubation of positive blood culture isolates demonstrated similar species-level identification rates across all methods (Biotyper: 84%, PRIME PICKME: 80%, PRIME Loop: 81%), although more repeats were needed compared with routine incubation. No difference in species identification occurred between users for any method at short incubation (89%-91%, HEU, vs 79%-85% LEU). Single-target process times were comparable for all methods (55-59 min), whereas PRIME methods had shorter hands-on times for analysis of multiple targets (Biotyper: 53 min, PRIME PICKME: 39 min, PRIME Loop: 40 min). These findings highlight the comparable performance of the PRIME and Biotyper systems while demonstrating the potential for time savings with PRIME workflows, particularly in high-throughput settings.IMPORTANCEThis study provides a critical evaluation of the new VITEK MS PRIME MALDI-TOF MS system, comparing its performance and workflow efficiency against the Bruker MALDI Biotyper. The study investigates the success rate of isolate identification from short incubation of positive blood cultures, illustrating the utility of this technique for downstream workflows such as faster reporting of results for patient management and isolate identification for interpretation of rapid phenotypic AST. Analysis of different workflows demonstrated areas for potential time savings, particularly in high-throughput settings. These findings highlight the importance of optimizing MALDI-TOF MS workflows in the era of workforce shortages and lab centralization to enhance rapid pathogen identification and improve patient care.
基质辅助激光解吸电离飞行时间质谱(MALDI-TOF MS)在临床实验室中被广泛用于快速鉴定细菌和酵母。VITEK MS PRIME(“PRIME”)是生物梅里埃公司最新的MALDI-TOF MS系统。本研究评估了PRIME相对于布鲁克公司的MALDI Biotyper CA系统(“Biotyper”)的性能和工作流程时间。我们使用三种方法比较了154株来自不同标本类型的细菌和酵母临床分离株:用牙签接种Biotyper靶板、用PICKME笔尖接种PRIME靶板以及用接种环接种PRIME靶板。还使用这些方法对阳性血培养分离株进行了分析,分析人员包括经验丰富的用户(HEU,n = 300)和经验不足的用户(LEU,n = 50),这些分离株在琼脂平板上经过短时间(6 - 8小时)和常规(18 - 24小时)培养。评估了从样品处理到微生物鉴定的工作流程时间,以确定节省的时间。PRIME系统对96%(PICKME方法)和95%(接种环方法)的挑战分离株鉴定到属水平,而Biotyper为99%。阳性血培养分离株的短时间培养显示,所有方法在种水平的鉴定率相似(Biotyper:84%,PRIME PICKME:80%,PRIME接种环:81%),不过与常规培养相比需要更多重复操作。在短时间培养时,任何方法在不同用户之间的种鉴定没有差异(HEU为89% - 91%,LEU为79% - 85%)。所有方法的单靶标处理时间相当(55 - 59分钟),而PRIME方法在分析多个靶标时的实际操作时间更短(Biotyper:53分钟,PRIME PICKME:39分钟,PRIME接种环:40分钟)。这些发现突出了PRIME和Biotyper系统的可比性能,同时证明了PRIME工作流程节省时间的潜力,特别是在高通量环境中。
重要性
本研究对新型VITEK MS PRIME MALDI-TOF MS系统进行了关键评估,将其性能和工作流程效率与布鲁克MALDI Biotyper进行了比较。该研究调查了阳性血培养短时间培养的分离株鉴定成功率,说明了该技术在下游工作流程中的实用性,如下游可为患者管理更快报告结果以及为快速表型AST解释进行分离株鉴定。对不同工作流程的分析表明了潜在节省时间的领域,特别是在高通量环境中。这些发现突出了在劳动力短缺和实验室集中化时代优化MALDI-TOF MS工作流程对于加强快速病原体鉴定和改善患者护理的重要性。