Choi Yu Jung, Song Joon Young, Wie Seong-Heon, Choi Won Suk, Lee Jacob, Lee Jin-Soo, Kim Young Keun, Kim Shin Woo, Lee Sun Hee, Park Kyung-Hwa, Jeong Hye Won, Yoon Jin Gu, Seong Hye, Nham Eliel, Noh Ji Yun, Cheong Hee Jin, Kim Woo Joo
Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul 08308, Republic of Korea.
Vaccine Innovation Center-KU Medicine (VIC-K), Seoul 02841, Republic of Korea.
Pathogens. 2025 May 29;14(6):543. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14060543.
After the transition of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) from a pandemic to an endemic phase, data on respiratory viral infections remain limited. This study compared the clinical outcomes of SARS-CoV-2, influenza virus (INFV), and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infections and investigated how underlying medical conditions influence disease severity. During Omicron subvariant dominant periods, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study including laboratory-confirmed cases of SARS-CoV-2, INFV, and RSV infections in hospitalized patients aged ≥ 19 years. We compared demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes and analyzed the association between underlying comorbidities and severity of infection. A total of 1850 cases with SARS-CoV-2, 98 with INFV, and 63 with RSV infections were analyzed. Notable differences in the occurrence of fever, cough, sputum, and dyspnea were observed among patients with the three different viral infections. Pneumonia was diagnosed more frequently in patients with RSV infection (65.6%) compared to those with INFV infection (42.9%) and SARS-CoV-2 (34.4%) ( < 0.01). For patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, the risk of pneumonia increased by 47% in the moderate-risk group and 37% in the high-risk group. Among hospitalized patients, pneumonia was more frequently identified in patients with RSV infection, with statistical significance. Furthermore, the presence of medical conditions significantly increased the risk of developing pneumonia.
在2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)从大流行阶段转变为地方流行阶段后,关于呼吸道病毒感染的数据仍然有限。本研究比较了严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)、流感病毒(INFV)和呼吸道合胞病毒(RSV)感染的临床结局,并调查了基础疾病如何影响疾病严重程度。在奥密克戎亚变体占主导的时期,我们进行了一项多中心回顾性队列研究,纳入了年龄≥19岁住院患者中实验室确诊的SARS-CoV-2、INFV和RSV感染病例。我们比较了人口统计学特征和临床结局,并分析了基础合并症与感染严重程度之间的关联。共分析了1850例SARS-CoV-2感染病例、98例INFV感染病例和63例RSV感染病例。在三种不同病毒感染的患者中,观察到发热、咳嗽、咳痰和呼吸困难的发生率存在显著差异。与INFV感染患者(42.9%)和SARS-CoV-2感染患者(34.4%)相比,RSV感染患者肺炎的诊断率更高(<0.01)。对于SARS-CoV-2感染患者,中风险组肺炎风险增加47%,高风险组增加37%。在住院患者中,RSV感染患者肺炎的确诊率更高,具有统计学意义。此外,基础疾病的存在显著增加了发生肺炎的风险。