Suppr超能文献

让患者和公众在将健康与社会护理研究证据转化为实践中发挥作用:PIPER研究(公众参与研究的实施途径)的实在论评价方案。

Developing a role for patients and the public in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice: the PIPER study (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) realist evaluation protocol.

作者信息

Staniszewska Sophie, Walsh Julia, Langley Joe, Dziedzic Krysia, Moult Alice, Andrews Nick, Bain Chris, Bearne Lindsay, Bird Paul, Gazeley Tracy, Grant Richard, Hickey Gary, Luff Rebekah, Rycroft-Malone Jo, Seers Kate, Skrybant Magdalena, Stacey Dawn, Swaithes Laura, Rasburn Mark

机构信息

Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.

Lab4Living, Sheffield Hallam University, Sheffield, S1 1WB, UK.

出版信息

Res Involv Engagem. 2025 Jul 14;11(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s40900-025-00728-w.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

While patients and the public are routinely involved as active collaborators in health and social care research, they are rarely involved in the implementation of research. The PIPER (Pathways to Implementation for Public Engagement in Research) research questions are: 1. How can patients, carers, service users and the public be involved in the implementation of health and social care research evidence into practice? 2. What types of roles, contributions and impact can patients, carers, service users and the public make to the implementation of health and social care evidence into practice? 3. How can we support patients, service users, carers and the public to contribute to the implementation of health and social care evidence into practice? 4. How can we co-produce the knowledge that explores a greater role for patients, carers, service users and the public in the implementation of health and social care evidence into practice?

METHODS

Our overarching methodological framework is realist evaluation. This study includes four work packages with a cross-cutting co-production theme. •Work Package 1: A realist review of published literature, grey literature and sources such as blogs. •Work Package 2: Interviews with 40-60 people using a realist approach. •Work Package 3: A series of workshops to co-design the PIPER Toolkit. •Work Package 4: Pilot evaluation of the PIPER Toolkit.

RESULTS

The scoping of the literature will be informed by the development of an initial programme theory that identifies the potential breadth of the field of public involvement in implementation. Data from the WP2 interviews will be used to iteratively refine the development of the context, mechanism and outcomes (CMOs). This will inform the PIPER Toolkit, which will consist of a set of 'Guiding Principles' supported by 'Practical Resources.' The PIPER Toolkit will enable an individual or a group to plan and undertake implementation activities. More specifically, the Guiding Principles will enable the Practical Resources to be tailored to specific implementation strategies for an individual or group.

DISCUSSION

Patient and public involvement in implementation is an emerging area of practice and is likely to significantly strengthen over the next decade. The PIPER Toolkit will recognise this early stage of development, identifying the key system enablers that organisations need to have in place to support this activity. The Toolkit will support patients and the public and implementation teams to navigate the field of implementation practice. The PIPER study will challenge the field of implementation and knowledge mobilisation research to develop clearer forms of partnership with patients and the public in both research and practice.

摘要

背景

虽然患者和公众通常作为积极的合作伙伴参与健康和社会护理研究,但他们很少参与研究的实施。PIPER(公众参与研究的实施途径)研究问题如下:1. 患者、护理人员、服务使用者和公众如何参与将健康和社会护理研究证据应用于实践?2. 患者、护理人员、服务使用者和公众在将健康和社会护理证据应用于实践中可以发挥哪些类型的作用,并做出哪些贡献和产生何种影响?3. 我们如何支持患者、服务使用者、护理人员和公众为将健康和社会护理证据应用于实践做出贡献?4. 我们如何共同产生知识,以探索患者、护理人员、服务使用者和公众在将健康和社会护理证据应用于实践中发挥更大作用?

方法

我们总体的方法框架是现实主义评价。本研究包括四个工作包,有一个贯穿各领域的共同生产主题。•工作包1:对已发表文献、灰色文献和博客等来源进行现实主义综述。•工作包2:采用现实主义方法对40 - 60人进行访谈。•工作包3:举办一系列研讨会共同设计PIPER工具包。•工作包4:对PIPER工具包进行试点评价。

结果

文献综述的范围将依据初步项目理论的发展来确定,该理论确定了公众参与实施领域的潜在广度。工作包2访谈的数据将用于迭代完善情境、机制和结果(CMO)的发展。这将为PIPER工具包提供信息,该工具包将由一套“指导原则”以及“实用资源”组成。PIPER工具包将使个人或团体能够规划并开展实施活动。更具体地说,指导原则将使实用资源能够针对个人或团体的特定实施策略进行调整。

讨论

患者和公众参与实施是一个新兴的实践领域,在未来十年可能会显著加强。PIPER工具包将认识到这一发展的早期阶段,确定组织为支持这项活动需要具备的关键系统促成因素。该工具包将支持患者、公众和实施团队在实施实践领域中前行。PIPER研究将挑战实施和知识传播研究领域,促使其在研究和实践中与患者和公众建立更清晰的伙伴关系形式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a60f/12261769/16cd2f0769ce/40900_2025_728_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验