Goyal Manjeet Kumar, Berinstein Elliot, Dutta Priyata, Ahuja Vineet, Higgins Peter D R, Berinstein Jeffrey, Bishu Shrinivas
Department of Gastroenterology and Human Nutrition, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi 110 029, India.
Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Indian J Gastroenterol. 2025 Jul 21. doi: 10.1007/s12664-025-01811-6.
Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), encompassing Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), is characterized by chronic gastrointestinal inflammation, leading to unpredictable flares and substantial morbidity. Gastrointestinal polymerase chain reaction (GI-PCR) testing has emerged as a widely used diagnostic tool to identify enteric pathogens during IBD exacerbations. It is a novel, quick and sensitive diagnostic test to detect Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), as well as other enteric pathogens. However, the clinical significance of non-C. difficile pathogens detected by GI-PCR remains uncertain, raising concerns about the over-interpretation of positive results and the potential for unnecessary antimicrobial therapy. While traditional stool culture and microscopy offered limited sensitivity, GI-PCR has dramatically improved pathogen detection rates, identifying infections in up to 26% of IBD patients compared to 5% with conventional methods. Beyond C. difficile, pathogens such as Escherichia coli (especially adherent-invasive strains), Campylobacter, Salmonella, Norovirus and Yersinia enterocolitica are frequently detected in IBD flares. However, whether these microbes actively drive disease exacerbations or merely reflect inflammation-associated dysbiosis remains unclear. Enterobacteriaceae, in particular, bloom in inflamed intestines, raising critical questions regarding their pathogenic role vs. colonization. The high sensitivity of GI-PCR further complicates clinical decision-making, as distinguishing active infection from harmless microbial presence is challenging. This review explores the current literature on GI-PCR in IBD, emphasizing its benefits and limitations. While GI-PCR provides rapid, comprehensive pathogen detection, its indiscriminate application may lead to unnecessary antibiotic use and therapeutic missteps. Understanding the ecological shifts in IBD-associated dysbiosis and refining clinical interpretation of GI-PCR results are essential to optimizing patient management. Future research should aim to delineate the pathogenic significance of non-C. difficile microbes and establish evidence-based protocols for the appropriate use of GI-PCR in IBD care.
炎症性肠病(IBD)包括克罗恩病(CD)和溃疡性结肠炎(UC),其特征为慢性胃肠道炎症,可导致不可预测的病情发作和严重的发病率。胃肠道聚合酶链反应(GI-PCR)检测已成为一种广泛应用的诊断工具,用于在IBD病情加重期间识别肠道病原体。它是一种新型、快速且灵敏的诊断测试,可检测艰难梭菌感染(CDI)以及其他肠道病原体。然而,通过GI-PCR检测到的非艰难梭菌病原体的临床意义仍不明确,这引发了对阳性结果过度解读以及不必要的抗菌治疗可能性的担忧。虽然传统的粪便培养和显微镜检查灵敏度有限,但GI-PCR显著提高了病原体检测率,与传统方法仅能识别5%的感染相比,它能在高达26%的IBD患者中识别出感染。除了艰难梭菌,在IBD病情发作时还经常检测到大肠杆菌(尤其是粘附侵袭性菌株)、弯曲杆菌、沙门氏菌、诺如病毒和小肠结肠炎耶尔森菌等病原体。然而,这些微生物是积极推动疾病加重还是仅仅反映炎症相关的生态失调仍不清楚。特别是肠杆菌科细菌在发炎的肠道中大量繁殖,这引发了关于它们的致病作用与定植的关键问题。GI-PCR的高灵敏度进一步使临床决策复杂化,因为区分主动感染与无害的微生物存在具有挑战性。本综述探讨了当前关于IBD中GI-PCR的文献,强调了其益处和局限性。虽然GI-PCR提供了快速、全面的病原体检测,但不加区分地应用可能导致不必要的抗生素使用和治疗失误。了解IBD相关生态失调中的生态变化并完善GI-PCR结果的临床解读对于优化患者管理至关重要。未来的研究应旨在阐明非艰难梭菌微生物的致病意义,并建立在IBD护理中合理使用GI-PCR的循证方案。