Suppr超能文献

:一项关于女性对非首选避孕方法使用的医学原因的认知与经历的定性研究。

": A qualitative study of women's perceptions and experiences of medical reasons for non-preferred contraceptive use.

作者信息

Chung Stephanie, Tumlinson Katherine, Palmquist Aunchalee, Senderowicz Leigh

机构信息

Department of Maternal and Child Health, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Carolina Population Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251358983. doi: 10.1177/17455057251358983. Epub 2025 Jul 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

People have contraceptive autonomy when they can obtain their preferred contraceptive method. Non-preferred method use may result from inappropriate medical contraindications, which occur when providers apply incorrect contraceptive eligibility criteria during consultations. Non-preferred method use and inappropriate medical contraindications are understudied in the Global South, partially due to measurement challenges.

OBJECTIVES

This study provides the first evidence in over two decades that inappropriate medical contraindications are still a barrier to preferred method use in the Global South and offer a new conceptual frame for a neglected medical barrier to contraceptive use.

DESIGN

We collected qualitative data from 49 in-depth interviews and 17 focus group discussions (n = 146) with women of reproductive age (15-49) in an anonymized African country.

METHODS

We deductively identified instances of preferred method denial for medical reasons, then analyzed these episodes to determine whether the medical reasons for denial were evidence-based.

RESULTS

We found that many women who reported preferred method denial described being offered medical reasons discordant with evidence-based guidelines, often resulting in what we determined to be contraceptive coercion. Specifically, we identified that (1) women experienced bi-directional contraceptive coercion with medical rationales, (2) women trusted providers' medical authority and felt unable to ask for more information, and finally, (3) women's personal reasons for their contraceptive preferences were rendered illegitimate by providers' use of biomedical language and (often incorrect) medical rationales. Consequentially, some women self-reported information indicating a legitimate contraindication to the non-preferred method their provider encouraged them to use.

CONCLUSION

Inappropriate medical contraindications are an under-studied facility-level barrier to contraceptive access that can result in contraceptive coercion, negative health outcomes, discontinuation of wanted methods, and loss of reproductive autonomy. Addressing inappropriate medical contraindications will require solutions that negotiate both structural factors and individual provider behavior to improve the quality of contraceptive service provision.

摘要

背景

当人们能够获得他们偏爱的避孕方法时,他们就拥有了避孕自主权。使用非偏爱的避孕方法可能是由于不恰当的医学禁忌,这发生在医疗服务提供者在咨询过程中应用了错误的避孕适用标准时。在全球南方地区,非偏爱的避孕方法使用情况以及不恰当的医学禁忌尚未得到充分研究,部分原因是测量方面存在挑战。

目的

本研究提供了二十多年来的首个证据,表明不恰当的医学禁忌仍然是全球南方地区获得偏爱的避孕方法的障碍,并为一个被忽视的避孕使用医学障碍提供了新的概念框架。

设计

我们在一个匿名的非洲国家,对49名育龄期(15 - 49岁)女性进行了深入访谈,并开展了17次焦点小组讨论(n = 146),收集了定性数据。

方法

我们通过演绎法确定因医学原因而拒绝使用偏爱方法的实例,然后分析这些情况以确定拒绝的医学原因是否基于证据。

结果

我们发现,许多报告称被拒绝使用偏爱方法的女性描述说,她们被告知的医学原因与循证指南不一致,这往往导致我们所认定的避孕强制行为。具体而言,我们发现:(1)女性经历了具有医学理由的双向避孕强制;(2)女性信任医疗服务提供者的医学权威,觉得无法询问更多信息;最后,(3)医疗服务提供者使用生物医学语言和(通常不正确的)医学理由,使女性避孕偏好的个人原因变得不合理。结果,一些女性自行报告了一些信息,表明她们对医疗服务提供者鼓励她们使用的非偏爱方法存在合理的禁忌。

结论

不恰当的医学禁忌是一个未得到充分研究的机构层面的避孕获取障碍,可能导致避孕强制、负面健康结果、停止使用期望的方法以及丧失生殖自主权。解决不恰当的医学禁忌问题需要采取能够兼顾结构因素和个体医疗服务提供者行为的解决方案,以提高避孕服务的提供质量。

相似文献

1
": A qualitative study of women's perceptions and experiences of medical reasons for non-preferred contraceptive use.
Womens Health (Lond). 2025 Jan-Dec;21:17455057251358983. doi: 10.1177/17455057251358983. Epub 2025 Jul 28.
3
Adapting Safety Plans for Autistic Adults with Involvement from the Autism Community.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):293-302. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0124. eCollection 2025 Jun.
5
Can We Enhance Shared Decision-making for Periacetabular Osteotomy Surgery? A Qualitative Study of Patient Experiences.
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):120-136. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003198. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
6
"In a State of Flow": A Qualitative Examination of Autistic Adults' Phenomenological Experiences of Task Immersion.
Autism Adulthood. 2024 Sep 16;6(3):362-373. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0032. eCollection 2024 Sep.
9
"Just Ask What Support We Need": Autistic Adults' Feedback on Social Skills Training.
Autism Adulthood. 2025 May 28;7(3):283-292. doi: 10.1089/aut.2023.0136. eCollection 2025 Jun.
10

本文引用的文献

1
Society of Family Planning Committee Statement: Contraception and body weight.
Contraception. 2025 Jan;141:110725. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110725. Epub 2024 Oct 11.
4
The Provider Role and Perspective in the Denial of Family Planning Services to Women in Malawi: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Mar 5;19(5):3076. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19053076.
5
Queering global health: an urgent call for LGBT+ affirmative practices.
Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Apr;10(4):e574-e578. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(22)00001-8. Epub 2022 Feb 14.
7
Patients' Involvement in Decision-Making During Healthcare in a Developing Country: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2021 May 26;15:1133-1140. doi: 10.2147/PPA.S302784. eCollection 2021.
8
Time to end weight stigma in healthcare.
EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Mar 30;34:100810. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.100810. eCollection 2021 Apr.
9
Prevalence of contraindications to progestin-only contraceptive pills in a multi-institution patient database.
Contraception. 2021 May;103(5):367-370. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2021.01.010. Epub 2021 Jan 30.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验