Suppr超能文献

胆结石疾病的保守治疗与早期胆囊切除术:随机对照试验的荟萃分析

Conservative Management Versus Early Cholecystectomy for Gallstone Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

作者信息

Ghose Kissan, Waheed Arooj, Khan Samina, Losier David, Heshma Anumalasetty Venkata Chandana, Bhatia Avni, Mehta Deepalee, Abbas Ayesha, Khan Iqra Yaseen, Allahi Ibtesam, Ayyan Muhammad, Shahzil Muhammad, Nabeel Ambreen, Iqbal Amna, Awan Rehmat Ullah

机构信息

Faculty of Science University of Lethbridge Lethbridge Canada.

Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellness Humber College Toronto Canada.

出版信息

JGH Open. 2025 Aug 13;9(8):e70253. doi: 10.1002/jgh3.70253. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

While most individuals with gallstone disease remain asymptomatic, symptoms of gallstone disease range from biliary pain to acute cholecystitis. Surgery is a popular choice of treatment, but evidence has also suggested conservative management as a safe and viable approach. We aim to investigate the evidence on conservative management versus early cholecystectomy for the management of gallstone disease.

METHODS

We searched electronic databases to retrieve and include all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that analyzed the efficacy and safety of conservative management versus early cholecystectomy in the management of gallstone disease. The revised Cochrane "Risk of bias" tool for randomized trials (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies. We calculated risk ratios (RR) along with the 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for all the outcomes. The random-effects model was used in our analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 RCTs were included in our meta-analysis. We found no statistically significant difference between conservative management and early cholecystectomy regarding the incidence of total intraoperative complications (RR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.14-1.42), total postoperative complications (RR 0.85; 95% CI: 0.48-1.50), total surgical complications (RR 0.68; 95% CI: 0.43-1.10), and mortality (RR 1.24; 95% CI: 0.81-1.89). The conservative management group was associated with a statistically significant higher incidence of total biliary complications (RR 3.63; 95% CI: 2.07-6.37), biliary colic (RR 2.75; 95% CI: 1.23-6.15), and common bile duct (CBD) stones (RR 3.96; 95% CI: 1.46-10.71). There was no difference in the incidence of biliary pancreatitis (RR 1.46; 95% CI: 0.49-4.35) and cholangitis (RR 1.52; 95% CI: 0.47-4.89).

CONCLUSION

According to our meta-analysis, conservative management offers no benefit over early cholecystectomy for gallstone disease; it increases the incidence of biliary complications in patients with gallstone disease. More studies are needed to better ascertain the role of conservative management in the management of gallstone disease.

摘要

目的

虽然大多数胆结石病患者无症状,但胆结石病的症状范围从胆绞痛到急性胆囊炎。手术是一种常用的治疗选择,但有证据表明保守治疗也是一种安全可行的方法。我们旨在研究保守治疗与早期胆囊切除术治疗胆结石病的证据。

方法

我们检索电子数据库以检索并纳入所有分析保守治疗与早期胆囊切除术治疗胆结石病疗效和安全性的随机对照试验(RCT)。采用修订后的Cochrane随机试验“偏倚风险”工具(RoB 2.0)评估纳入研究的偏倚风险。我们计算了所有结局的风险比(RR)及其95%置信区间(95%CI)。分析采用随机效应模型。

结果

我们的荟萃分析共纳入11项RCT。我们发现,在总术中并发症发生率(RR 0.45;95%CI:0.14 - 1.42)、总术后并发症发生率(RR 0.85;95%CI:0.48 - 1.50)、总手术并发症发生率(RR 0.68;95%CI:0.43 - 1.10)和死亡率(RR 1.24;95%CI:0.81 - 1.89)方面,保守治疗与早期胆囊切除术之间无统计学显著差异。保守治疗组的总胆道并发症发生率(RR 3.63;95%CI:2.07 - 6.37)、胆绞痛发生率(RR 2.75;95%CI:1.23 - 6.15)和胆总管结石发生率(RR 3.96;95%CI:1.46 - 10.71)在统计学上显著更高。胆源性胰腺炎发生率(RR 1.46;95%CI:0.49 - 4.35)和胆管炎发生率(RR 1.52;95%CI:0.47 - 4.89)无差异。

结论

根据我们的荟萃分析,对于胆结石病,保守治疗并不比早期胆囊切除术更具优势;它会增加胆结石病患者胆道并发症的发生率。需要更多研究以更好地确定保守治疗在胆结石病治疗中的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验