Yuan Ye, Zhou Junhui, Zhang Yanjiao, Zhong Wei, Lu Xing
Department of Anesthesiology, Henan Provincial Chest Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
Department of Anesthesiology, Chest Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, Henan, China.
BMJ Open. 2025 Aug 13;15(8):e105008. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-105008.
Paravertebral blockade (PVB) is a regional anaesthesia technique increasingly used in paediatric cardiothoracic surgery for postoperative pain management. However, its comparative efficacy and safety relative to other analgesic strategies remain inadequately synthesised. This systematic review aims to evaluate the effectiveness, safety and complications of PVB in paediatric patients undergoing cardiothoracic surgery.
This protocol adheres to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocols guidelines. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, ClinicalTrials.gov and other relevant sources from inception to February 2025. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing PVB with systemic opioids, epidural analgesia or placebo in patients aged <18 years will be included. Exclusion criteria include non-RCTs, adult populations and non-cardiothoracic surgeries. Primary outcomes include postoperative pain intensity measured using validated scales such as Face, Legs, Activity, Cry, Consolability Scale or Numeric Rating Scale within 24-48 hours. Secondary outcomes include opioid consumption within 24-48 hours, length of hospital stay, haemodynamic stability and complications (eg, pneumothorax, local anaesthetic toxicity). Two reviewers will independently screen studies, extract data and assess the risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias-2 tool. A meta-analysis using a random-effects model or a narrative synthesis will be conducted based on heterogeneity (²≥75%). Subgroup analyses will explore variations by age group, surgical type and PVB technique.
As this study involves secondary analysis of existing data, ethical approval is not required. The completed review will be submitted for open-access publication in a peer-reviewed journal to ensure accessibility for clinicians, researchers and policymakers.
CRD42025644837.
椎旁阻滞(PVB)是一种区域麻醉技术,越来越多地用于小儿心胸外科手术的术后疼痛管理。然而,相对于其他镇痛策略,其相对疗效和安全性仍未得到充分综合。本系统评价旨在评估PVB在接受心胸外科手术的小儿患者中的有效性、安全性和并发症。
本方案遵循系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目指南。我们将检索MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、科学网、Scopus、ClinicalTrials.gov及其他相关来源,检索时间从创建至2025年2月。将纳入比较PVB与全身阿片类药物、硬膜外镇痛或安慰剂在18岁以下患者中的随机对照试验(RCT)。排除标准包括非RCT、成人人群和非心胸外科手术。主要结局包括在24 - 48小时内使用有效量表(如面部、腿部、活动、哭闹、安慰量表或数字评分量表)测量的术后疼痛强度。次要结局包括24 - 48小时内的阿片类药物消耗量、住院时间、血流动力学稳定性和并发症(如气胸、局部麻醉药毒性)。两名评价者将独立筛选研究、提取数据并使用Cochrane偏倚风险-2工具评估偏倚风险。将根据异质性(I²≥75%)使用随机效应模型进行Meta分析或进行叙述性综合分析。亚组分析将探讨不同年龄组、手术类型和PVB技术的差异。
由于本研究涉及对现有数据的二次分析,无需伦理批准。完成的综述将提交至同行评审期刊进行开放获取出版,以确保临床医生、研究人员和政策制定者能够获取。
PROSPERO注册号:CRD42025644837。