Suppr超能文献

南非豪登省临床护士对研究的看法:一项定性研究。

Clinical nurses' perceptions of research in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a qualitative study.

作者信息

Gundo Rodwell, Mulaudzi Fhumulani, Lavhelani Robert, Koloti Matshidiso, Moasa Pleasure

机构信息

Department of Nursing Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.

出版信息

BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 18;24(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03736-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Nurses are expected to engage in research to inform evidence-based practice; however, research remains poorly integrated into routine clinical work for many. This study explored clinical nurses’ perceptions of research to inform the development of a research capacity-building program in Gauteng Province, South Africa.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive design was used. Data were collected through focus group discussions and individual interviews with 29 nurses from two public hospitals in Gauteng Province. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using conventional content analysis.

RESULTS

Three themes emerged: [1] - participants acknowledged hospital support through research permissions and opportunities to attend symposiums; [2] - many viewed research as exclusive to academics, with some expressing fear or limited understanding of research processes; [3] - participants cited factors such as staff shortages, lack of protected time for research, frequent ward rotations disrupting research interests, limited library access, and negativity from some managers and colleagues. One participant shared, ,,.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nurses recognized the value of research, structural and individual barriers limit their participation. Strengthening research training within nursing education, improving access to research resources, and fostering a supportive organizational culture are essential to enhancing research engagement and promoting evidence-based nursing practice in South Africa.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

Not applicable.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12912-025-03736-z.

摘要

背景

护士应参与研究以指导循证实践;然而,对许多人来说,研究仍未很好地融入日常临床工作。本研究探讨了临床护士对研究的看法,以促进南非豪登省研究能力建设项目的开展。

方法

采用定性描述性设计。通过焦点小组讨论和对豪登省两家公立医院的29名护士进行个人访谈收集数据。访谈进行录音,逐字转录,并使用常规内容分析法进行分析。

结果

出现了三个主题:[1]——参与者认可医院通过研究许可和参加研讨会的机会提供的支持;[2]——许多人认为研究是学者独有的,一些人表示对研究过程感到恐惧或了解有限;[3]——参与者列举了诸如人员短缺、缺乏研究的受保护时间、频繁的病房轮岗扰乱研究兴趣、图书馆访问受限以及一些管理人员和同事的消极态度等因素。一位参与者分享道,……

结论

尽管护士认识到研究的价值,但结构和个人障碍限制了他们的参与。加强护理教育中的研究培训、改善研究资源的获取以及营造支持性的组织文化对于提高南非的研究参与度和促进循证护理实践至关重要。

临床试验编号

不适用。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1186/s12912 - 025 - 03736 - z获取的补充材料。

相似文献

1
Clinical nurses' perceptions of research in Gauteng Province, South Africa: a qualitative study.
BMC Nurs. 2025 Aug 18;24(1):1074. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03736-z.
2
The status of machine learning in HIV testing in South Africa: a qualitative inquiry with stakeholders in Gauteng province.
Front Digit Health. 2025 Aug 1;7:1618781. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1618781. eCollection 2025.
7
Comparing nurse managers and nurses' perceptions of nurses' self-leadership during capacity building.
J Nurs Manag. 2014 May;22(4):532-9. doi: 10.1111/jonm.12235. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
9
Factors influencing the retention of registered nurses in the Gauteng Province of South Africa.
Curationis. 2011 Dec 14;34(1):E1-9. doi: 10.4102/curationis.v34i1.16.

本文引用的文献

3
A practical guide to reflexivity in qualitative research: AMEE Guide No. 149.
Med Teach. 2022 Apr 7:1-11. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2022.2057287.
4
6
African-led health research and capacity building- is it working?
BMC Public Health. 2020 Jul 14;20(1):1104. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-08875-3.
7
A minimal common outcome measure set for COVID-19 clinical research.
Lancet Infect Dis. 2020 Aug;20(8):e192-e197. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(20)30483-7. Epub 2020 Jun 12.
8
Research capacity in nursing: a concept analysis based on a scoping review.
BMJ Open. 2019 Nov 21;9(11):e032356. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032356.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验