Galmarini Carlos María, Zamora Rafael, Gómez Del Campo Pablo, Del Castillo-Izquierdo José, De All José Antonio, Domínguez Juan Manuel
R&D Department, Topazium Artificial Intelligence, Calle Bahía de Pollensa 5, 28042, Madrid, Comunidad de Madrid, Spain.
Medicus, Larrea 877, C1117, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Br J Cancer. 2025 Aug 20. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03157-4.
Practice guidelines recommend panitumumab with chemotherapy to treat KRAS wild-type (WT) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients. However, not all patients respond to this therapy. We propose a score termed "PROCC" to identify likely panitumumab responders.
The training (TRDS) and validation (VALDS) datasets included KRAS WT mCRC patients treated with panitumumab (P) plus chemotherapy (TRDS, FOLFOX4; VALDS, FOLFIRI). TRDS included 36 diverse features used to generate synthetic representations analyzed via machine learning (ML) to identify patient subgroups, which were correlated with PFS and OS. A multivariable logistic regression model identified independent predictors to develop a predictive score.
ML identified two subpopulations in TRDS: SP-A (n = 162) and SP-B (n = 298). Only SP-A patients under P/FOLFOX4 showed improved OS versus FOLFOX4 (HR 0.68; p = 0.04). CEA, ALP, LDH, and platelets at baseline were used to create a predictive score ("PROCC"). For TRDS, the score had an area under the curve of 0.81. PROCC ≥8.5 correlated with lower risks of progression (HR 0.67; p = 0.03) and death (HR 0.65; p = 0.04) for P/FOLFOX4 versus FOLFOX4. Validation in VALDS confirmed similar results with FOLFIRI.
Based on four baseline parameters, PROCC may guide the selection of KRAS WT mCRC patients most likely to benefit from panitumumab.
实践指南推荐帕尼单抗联合化疗用于治疗KRAS野生型(WT)转移性结直肠癌(mCRC)患者。然而,并非所有患者都对这种治疗有反应。我们提出了一个名为“PROCC”的评分系统来识别可能对帕尼单抗有反应的患者。
训练数据集(TRDS)和验证数据集(VALDS)纳入了接受帕尼单抗(P)联合化疗(TRDS为FOLFOX4方案;VALDS为FOLFIRI方案)治疗的KRAS WT mCRC患者。TRDS包含36个不同特征,用于生成通过机器学习(ML)分析的合成表征,以识别与无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)相关的患者亚组。多变量逻辑回归模型确定了独立预测因子,以制定预测评分。
ML在TRDS中识别出两个亚组:SP - A(n = 162)和SP - B(n = 298)。仅P/FOLFOX4方案治疗下的SP - A患者的OS较FOLFOX4方案有所改善(风险比[HR] 0.68;p = 0.04)。使用基线时的癌胚抗原(CEA)、碱性磷酸酶(ALP)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)和血小板来创建预测评分(“PROCC”)。对于TRDS,该评分的曲线下面积为0.81。与FOLFOX4方案相比,P/FOLFOX4方案中PROCC≥8.5与较低的疾病进展风险(HR 0.67;p = 0.03)和死亡风险(HR 0.65;p = 0.04)相关。VALDS中的验证结果证实了FOLFIRI方案有类似结果。
基于四个基线参数,PROCC可能有助于指导选择最有可能从帕尼单抗治疗中获益的KRAS WT mCRC患者。