Tang Yuting, Zhang Min, He Chuning, Huang Yiming, Fang Xinxin, Wang Xuechun, Wang Fuyuan, Zhang Yiran
School of Population Medicine and Public Health, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2025 Aug 11;15(8):155. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe15080155.
Workplace violence (WPV) against healthcare workers (HCWs) in infectious disease hospitals, particularly in high-risk settings, remains a critical yet understudied occupational hazard. A mixed-methods study was conducted at a Chinese infectious disease hospital, combining quantitative surveys (N = 675) and semi-structured interviews (28 HCWs, 17 patients/families). Logistic regression was used to analyze WPV incidence and predictors, while a thematic analysis of interview data identified contextual drivers. Psychological violence (34.1%) was significantly more prevalent than physical violence (2.2%), with outpatient departments (44.1%) and temporary staff (OR = 1.72) at the highest risk. Qualitative themes revealed systemic triggers, including communication breakdowns, environmental stressors, and organizational gaps in safety protocols and reporting. This study addressed a critical gap by incorporating the perspectives of HCWs and patients, revealing that WPV perceptions vary due to differing expectations and experiences. From these results, the CARE (Communication, Advocacy, Respect, Education) framework proposes actionable strategies: standardized SBAR communication protocols, enhanced security protocols in high-risk units, and mandatory anti-violence training. These findings underscore the need to strengthen the occupational health system to mitigate WPV and to improve healthcare quality.
针对传染病医院医护人员的工作场所暴力(WPV),尤其是在高风险环境中,仍然是一种关键但研究不足的职业危害。在中国一家传染病医院进行了一项混合方法研究,结合了定量调查(N = 675)和半结构化访谈(28名医护人员、17名患者/家属)。使用逻辑回归分析工作场所暴力的发生率和预测因素,同时对访谈数据进行主题分析以确定背景驱动因素。心理暴力(34.1%)比身体暴力(2.2%)明显更普遍,门诊部(44.1%)和临时工作人员(OR = 1.72)风险最高。定性主题揭示了系统性触发因素,包括沟通中断、环境压力源以及安全协议和报告方面的组织差距。本研究通过纳入医护人员和患者的观点填补了一个关键空白,表明由于期望和经历不同,对工作场所暴力的认知也有所不同。基于这些结果,CARE(沟通、倡导、尊重、教育)框架提出了可采取行动的策略:标准化SBAR沟通协议、加强高风险科室的安全协议以及强制性反暴力培训。这些发现强调了加强职业健康系统以减轻工作场所暴力并提高医疗质量的必要性。