Lyu Shupeng, Qian Chen, Yuan Ling, Yuan Zhidong, Lee Ching-Hung
School of Public Policy and Administration, Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China.
Front Public Health. 2025 Sep 1;13:1666323. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1666323. eCollection 2025.
Infectious disease outbreaks have imprinted unprecedentedly on global economies, societies, politics, and healthcare systems. The COVID-19 pandemic underscored critical challenges in global healthcare delivery, necessitating the translation of lessons into actionable strategies for strengthening health system resilience against future outbreaks.
This paper divides resilience into two dimensions: resilience from scale and resilience from structure. The former pertains to the overall resilience of the "state-society" system, while the latter refers to resilience rooted in the system's internal structure. Expert consultation method is used to assess the potential and actual levels of two types of resilience. The case study and time slicing approach are used to analyze the anti-epidemic policies in four countries.
There are significant differences in the potential and actual levels of resilience from scale and resilience from structure in the event of infectious disease outbreaks in China, Singapore, the U.S., and the U.K., as a result of a combination of political and non-political factors. Based on the original perspective of two types of resilience, this study reveals that differences in anti-epidemic policies among these countries stem from variations in the resilience from scale and resilience from structure.
This paper elucidates the divergent global responses to the same virus from the original perspective of two types of resilience. Furthermore, the study presents a practice-oriented framework that links health system scale and structure to anti-epidemic policies, thereby moving beyond existing indices like the Global Health Security Index. The findings deliver concrete lessons for improving managerial practices, enhancing preparedness, and informing future healthcare delivery innovations, directly contributing to translating pandemic experience into implementable best practices for strengthening health systems against infectious disease threats.
传染病爆发对全球经济、社会、政治和医疗体系产生了前所未有的影响。新冠疫情凸显了全球医疗服务面临的严峻挑战,因此有必要将经验教训转化为切实可行的策略,以增强卫生系统应对未来疫情爆发的韧性。
本文将韧性分为两个维度:规模韧性和结构韧性。前者关乎“国家-社会”系统的整体韧性,后者指源于系统内部结构的韧性。采用专家咨询法评估两种韧性的潜在水平和实际水平。运用案例研究和时间切片方法分析四个国家的抗疫政策。
由于政治和非政治因素的综合作用,中国、新加坡、美国和英国在传染病爆发时,规模韧性和结构韧性的潜在水平和实际水平存在显著差异。基于两种韧性的原始视角,本研究表明这些国家抗疫政策的差异源于规模韧性和结构韧性的不同。
本文从两种韧性的原始视角阐明了全球对同一种病毒的不同应对方式。此外,该研究提出了一个以实践为导向的框架,将卫生系统的规模和结构与抗疫政策联系起来,从而超越了全球卫生安全指数等现有指标。研究结果为改进管理实践、加强防范以及为未来医疗服务创新提供了具体经验教训,直接有助于将疫情经验转化为可实施的最佳实践,以增强卫生系统抵御传染病威胁的能力。