Lydiard R B, Stahl S M, Hertzman M, Harrison W M
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Nov;58(11):484-91. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v58n1104.
This study was designed to compare the efficacy, safety, tolerability profiles, and effects on quality of life of the serotonin selective reuptake inhibitor antidepressant sertraline versus the nonselective tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline and placebo in patients with major depression.
Outpatients with DSM-III-R major depression were randomly assigned to double-blind treatment for 8 weeks with sertraline (50-200 mg daily), amitriptyline (50-150 mg daily), or matching placebo. Assessments included the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression, Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Severity of Illness scale, Clinical Global Impressions-Improvement scale, Global Assessment Scale, Profile of Mood States, Beck Depression Inventory, Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire, and Health-Related Quality of Life battery.
All treatment groups demonstrated statistically significant improvement from baseline in depression ratings by Week 1 and thereafter. The antidepressant effects of amitriptyline and sertraline were significantly (p < .05) greater than placebo and did not differ significantly from each other. Sertraline was associated with significantly (p < .05) greater subjective (i.e., patient-rated) improvement in mood than amitriptyline or placebo. Both active drugs were associated with greater improvements than placebo on most quality of life measurements. On several items, sertraline, but not amitriptyline, was superior to placebo. There was a discernible effect of sertraline earlier than amitriptyline on most quality of life scales. Amitriptyline therapy was associated with significantly more treatment-related adverse events, and discontinuations due to treatment-related adverse events, in comparison to both sertraline and placebo therapy.
Sertraline and amitriptyline each were effective treatments for major depression as assessed by both physician- and patient-rated scales. These results show that sertraline therapy is better tolerated than amitriptyline therapy. Quality of life was also improved by effective antidepressant treatment, with sertraline showing a tendency to produce greater improvements on quality of life measures.
本研究旨在比较5-羟色胺选择性再摄取抑制剂抗抑郁药舍曲林与非选择性三环类抗抑郁药阿米替林及安慰剂对重度抑郁症患者的疗效、安全性、耐受性概况以及生活质量的影响。
符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第三版修订本(DSM-III-R)重度抑郁症诊断标准的门诊患者被随机分配接受为期8周的双盲治疗,分别服用舍曲林(每日50-200毫克)、阿米替林(每日50-150毫克)或匹配的安慰剂。评估指标包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表、蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁量表、临床总体印象-疾病严重程度量表、临床总体印象-改善量表、总体评估量表、情绪状态剖面图、贝克抑郁量表、生活质量享受与满意度问卷以及健康相关生活质量量表。
所有治疗组在第1周及之后的抑郁评分与基线相比均有统计学意义的显著改善。阿米替林和舍曲林的抗抑郁效果显著优于安慰剂(p < 0.05),且二者之间无显著差异。与阿米替林或安慰剂相比,舍曲林在主观情绪改善方面(即患者自评)显著更好(p < 0.05)。在大多数生活质量测量指标上,两种活性药物的改善程度均优于安慰剂。在几个项目上,舍曲林优于安慰剂,而阿米替林则不然。在大多数生活质量量表上,舍曲林比阿米替林起效更早。与舍曲林和安慰剂治疗相比,阿米替林治疗导致的治疗相关不良事件以及因治疗相关不良事件而停药的情况显著更多。
根据医生和患者评定量表评估,舍曲林和阿米替林均为重度抑郁症的有效治疗药物。这些结果表明,舍曲林治疗的耐受性优于阿米替林治疗。有效的抗抑郁治疗也改善了生活质量,舍曲林在生活质量测量指标上有产生更大改善的趋势。