Manecke Gerard R, Auger William R
Department of Anesthesiology, UCSD Medical Center, San Diego, CA 92103, USA.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth. 2007 Feb;21(1):3-7. doi: 10.1053/j.jvca.2006.08.004. Epub 2006 Oct 24.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accuracy and precision of a novel algorithm that evaluates cardiac output by using arterial pressure waveform characteristics.
Prospective, observational study comparing the cardiac output values of intermittent thermodilution, continuous thermodilution, and continuous arterial pressure wave assessment.
The intensive care unit in a tertiary care university hospital.
Fifty postoperative cardiac surgical patients, within the first 12 hours after surgery.
All patients received a pulmonary artery catheter (PAC) and at least 1 systemic arterial pressure catheter. The data from the arterial catheter were processed by using a new arterial pressure cardiac output (APCO) algorithm. The data from the PAC (continuous and intermittent assessments) were collected for comparison with the APCO.
Two hundred ninety-five cardiac output measurements using intermittent thermodilution (ICO), continuous thermodilution (CCO), and arterial pressure-based output (APCO) were obtained during various times during the first 12 postoperative hours. The measurements of each method at each time point were compared by using Bland-Altman analysis.
The mean cardiac output ranged from 2.77 to 9.60 L/min. APCO, compared with ICO, revealed a bias of 0.55 L/min and precision of 0.98 L/min. APCO, compared with CCO, revealed a bias of 0.06 L/min and precision of 1.06 L/min. The APCO agreement between femoral and radial arterial catheters was close; the bias was -0.15 L/min, and the precision was 0.56 L/min.
This novel arterial pressure cardiac output algorithm provides cardiac output assessments that agree satisfactorily for clinical purposes with intermittent and continuous thermodilution techniques in postoperative cardiac surgical patients. Further study is required for other patient populations and clinical situations.
本研究旨在评估一种利用动脉压力波形特征评估心输出量的新算法的准确性和精确性。
前瞻性观察性研究,比较间歇性热稀释法、连续性热稀释法和连续性动脉压力波评估法的心输出量值。
一所三级大学医院的重症监护病房。
50例心脏手术后患者,术后12小时内。
所有患者均接受肺动脉导管(PAC)和至少1根体动脉压力导管。动脉导管的数据采用新的动脉压力心输出量(APCO)算法进行处理。收集PAC的数据(连续性和间歇性评估)以与APCO进行比较。
在术后12小时内的不同时间,使用间歇性热稀释法(ICO)、连续性热稀释法(CCO)和基于动脉压力的心输出量(APCO)进行了295次心输出量测量。通过Bland-Altman分析比较每个时间点各方法的测量值。
平均心输出量范围为2.77至9.60升/分钟。与ICO相比,APCO的偏差为0.55升/分钟,精确性为0.98升/分钟。与CCO相比,APCO的偏差为0.06升/分钟,精确性为1.06升/分钟。股动脉和桡动脉导管之间的APCO一致性接近;偏差为-0.15升/分钟,精确性为0.56升/分钟。
这种新的动脉压力心输出量算法提供的心输出量评估结果,对于临床目的而言,与术后心脏手术患者的间歇性和连续性热稀释技术结果令人满意地相符。对于其他患者群体和临床情况,还需要进一步研究。