Suppr超能文献

为《健康人民2020》设定一个具有挑战性但切实可行的吸烟率目标:借鉴加利福尼亚州的经验。

Setting a challenging yet realistic smoking prevalence target for Healthy People 2020: learning from the California experience.

作者信息

Mendez David, Warner Kenneth E

机构信息

Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, 109 Observatory Rd, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 2008 Mar;98(3):556-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107441. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

We sought to outline an optimistic yet achievable goal for future US smoking prevalence rates based on empirical evidence reflecting the success of smoking control efforts in California.

METHODS

Using a dynamic model and the smoking initiation and cessation rates achieved in California as a guide, we projected US adult smoking prevalence rates through the year 2020.

RESULTS

If smoking initiation and cessation rates for the nation do not change, population dynamics will result in smoking prevalence rates falling to 19.1% in 2010 and 16.8% in 2020. If the country attains California's initiation and cessation rates by 2010, adult smoking prevalence rates will be 18.5% in 2010 and 14.7% as of 2020.

CONCLUSIONS

If California's smoking initiation and cessation rates are attained nationwide, the US smoking prevalence rate could be 5.9 percentage points lower than the 2005 rate by the year 2020, and there would be 10.2 million fewer smokers than in 2005. A target of 14% smoking prevalence by 2020 is aggressive yet feasible, given that it takes into account the constraints imposed by population demographics.

摘要

目标

我们试图根据反映加利福尼亚州控烟努力成功的实证证据,勾勒出美国未来吸烟流行率的一个乐观但可实现的目标。

方法

以一个动态模型并以加利福尼亚州实现的吸烟起始率和戒烟率为指导,我们预测了到2020年美国成年人的吸烟流行率。

结果

如果全国的吸烟起始率和戒烟率不变,人口动态变化将导致吸烟流行率在2010年降至19.1%,在2020年降至16.8%。如果该国到2010年达到加利福尼亚州的起始率和戒烟率,2010年成年人吸烟流行率将为18.5%,到2020年为14.7%。

结论

如果在全国范围内达到加利福尼亚州的吸烟起始率和戒烟率,到2020年美国吸烟流行率可能比2005年的水平低5.9个百分点,吸烟者将比2005年减少1020万。鉴于考虑到人口统计学所带来的限制,到2020年将吸烟流行率目标设定为14%虽具挑战性但可行。

相似文献

1
Setting a challenging yet realistic smoking prevalence target for Healthy People 2020: learning from the California experience.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Mar;98(3):556-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2006.107441. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
2
Building and Scaling-up California Quits: Supporting Health Systems Change for Tobacco Treatment.
Am J Prev Med. 2018 Dec;55(6 Suppl 2):S214-S221. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2018.07.045.
3
Using a cessation-related outcome index to assess California's cessation progress at the population level.
Tob Control. 2010 Apr;19 Suppl 1(Suppl_1):i56-61. doi: 10.1136/tc.2009.031047.
4
California as a model.
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Sep 15;19(18 Suppl):69S-73S.
5
The Greater Southern Area Health Service Tobacco Control Plan 2006-2009.
N S W Public Health Bull. 2008 Mar-Apr;19(3-4):48-9. doi: 10.1071/nb07081.
6
Tobacco control success versus demographic destiny: examining the causes of the low smoking prevalence in California.
Am J Public Health. 2008 Feb;98(2):268-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.112318. Epub 2008 Jan 2.
7
Small-area estimation and prioritizing communities for tobacco control efforts in Massachusetts.
Am J Public Health. 2009 Mar;99(3):470-9. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2007.130112. Epub 2009 Jan 15.
8
Tobacco and aboriginal people in NSW.
N S W Public Health Bull. 2008 Mar-Apr;19(3-4):65-7. doi: 10.1071/nb07123.
9
Adolescent smoking decline during California's tobacco control programme.
Tob Control. 2005 Jun;14(3):207-12. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.010116.
10
The impact of changes in tobacco control funding on healthcare expenditures in California, 2012-2016.
Tob Control. 2013 May;22(e1):e10-5. doi: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050130. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

引用本文的文献

2
A Magic Bullet? The Potential Impact of E-Cigarettes on the Toll of Cigarette Smoking.
Nicotine Tob Res. 2021 Mar 19;23(4):654-661. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa160.
3
The 20-year impact of tobacco price and tobacco control expenditure increases in Minnesota, 1998-2017.
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 18;15(3):e0230364. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230364. eCollection 2020.
4
Modeling the potential effects of new tobacco products and policies: a dynamic population model for multiple product use and harm.
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 27;10(3):e0121008. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121008. eCollection 2015.
7
Impact of Broadened Coverage of Smoking Cessation Treatments on Cardiovascular Disease.
Curr Cardiovasc Risk Rep. 2012 Dec 1;6(6):542-548. doi: 10.1007/s12170-012-0275-8.
8
Accuracy and importance of projections from a dynamic simulation model of smoking prevalence in the United States.
Am J Public Health. 2012 Nov;102(11):2045-8. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.300771. Epub 2012 Sep 20.
9
Socioepidemiology of cigarette smoking among Cambodian Americans in Long Beach, California.
J Immigr Minor Health. 2012 Apr;14(2):272-80. doi: 10.1007/s10903-011-9478-1.
10
Application of a system dynamics model to inform investment in smoking cessation services in New Zealand.
Am J Public Health. 2010 Jul;100(7):1274-81. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.171165. Epub 2010 May 13.

本文引用的文献

2
The financial implications of coverage of smoking cessation treatment by managed care organizations.
Inquiry. 2004 Spring;41(1):57-69. doi: 10.5034/inquiryjrnl_41.1.57.
3
Mortality in relation to smoking: 50 years' observations on male British doctors.
BMJ. 2004 Jun 26;328(7455):1519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38142.554479.AE. Epub 2004 Jun 22.
4
Adult cigarette smoking prevalence: declining as expected (not as desired).
Am J Public Health. 2004 Feb;94(2):251-2. doi: 10.2105/ajph.94.2.251.
5
Smoking prevalence in 2010: why the healthy people goal is unattainable.
Am J Public Health. 2000 Mar;90(3):401-3. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.3.401.
6
Has the California tobacco control program reduced smoking?
JAMA. 1998 Sep 9;280(10):893-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.280.10.893.
7
Has smoking cessation ceased? Expected trends in the prevalence of smoking in the United States.
Am J Epidemiol. 1998 Aug 1;148(3):249-58. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a009632.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验