Department of Neurosurgery, Henry Ford Health System, 2799 West Grand Blvd, K-11, Detroit, MI 48202, USA.
J Neurooncol. 2010 Jan;96(1):33-43. doi: 10.1007/s11060-009-0061-8. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
Should patients with newly-diagnosed metastatic brain tumors undergo open surgical resection versus whole brain radiation therapy (WBRT) and/or other treatment modalities such as radiosurgery, and in what clinical settings? Target population These recommendations apply to adults with a newly diagnosed single brain metastasis amenable to surgical resection. Recommendations Surgical resection plus WBRT versus surgical resection alone Level 1 Surgical resection followed by WBRT represents a superior treatment modality, in terms of improving tumor control at the original site of the metastasis and in the brain overall, when compared to surgical resection alone. Surgical resection plus WBRT versus SRS +/- WBRT Level 2 Surgical resection plus WBRT, versus stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) plus WBRT, both represent effective treatment strategies, resulting in relatively equal survival rates. SRS has not been assessed from an evidence-based standpoint for larger lesions (>3 cm) or for those causing significant mass effect (>1 cm midline shift). Level 3 Underpowered class I evidence along with the preponderance of conflicting class II evidence suggests that SRS alone may provide equivalent functional and survival outcomes compared with resection + WBRT for patients with single brain metastases, so long as ready detection of distant site failure and salvage SRS are possible. Note The following question is fully addressed in the WBRT guideline paper within this series by Gaspar et al. Given that the recommendation resulting from the systematic review of the literature on this topic is also highly relevant to the discussion of the role of surgical resection in the management of brain metastases, this recommendation has been included below. Question Does surgical resection in addition to WBRT improve outcomes when compared with WBRT alone? Target population This recommendation applies to adults with a newly diagnosed single brain metastasis amenable to surgical resection; however, the recommendation does not apply to relatively radiosensitive tumors histologies (i.e., small cell lung cancer, leukemia, lymphoma, germ cell tumors and multiple myeloma). Recommendation Surgical resection plus WBRT versus WBRT alone Level 1 Class I evidence supports the use of surgical resection plus post-operative WBRT, as compared to WBRT alone, in patients with good performance status (functionally independent and spending less than 50% of time in bed) and limited extra-cranial disease. There is insufficient evidence to make a recommendation for patients with poor performance scores, advanced systemic disease, or multiple brain metastases.
是否应将新诊断的脑转移瘤患者进行开颅手术切除与全脑放疗(WBRT)和/或其他治疗方式(如立体定向放射外科手术,SRS),以及在哪些临床情况下进行?
这些建议适用于可进行手术切除的新诊断为单发脑转移瘤的成年人。
手术切除联合 WBRT 与单纯手术切除
1 级:与单纯手术切除相比,手术切除联合 WBRT 在控制转移瘤原发病灶和大脑总体肿瘤方面是一种更优的治疗方式。
手术切除联合 WBRT 与 SRS+/-WBRT
2 级:手术切除联合 WBRT 与 SRS 联合 WBRT 均为有效的治疗策略,导致的生存率大致相当。SRS 尚未从循证医学角度评估大于 3cm 的较大病变或中线移位大于 1cm 的病变。
3 级:证据不足的 1 级证据以及大量相互矛盾的 2 级证据表明,对于单发脑转移瘤患者,SRS 单独治疗与手术切除联合 WBRT 相比,可能提供等效的功能和生存结果,只要能够及时发现远处部位失败并进行挽救性 SRS。
这一问题在 Gaspar 等人撰写的本系列 WBRT 指南中已全面讨论。鉴于针对这一主题的文献系统评价得出的建议也与讨论手术切除在脑转移瘤管理中的作用高度相关,因此以下建议也包括在内。
与单纯 WBRT 相比,手术切除联合 WBRT 是否能改善结局?
该建议适用于新诊断为单发脑转移瘤且可进行手术切除的成年人;然而,该建议不适用于对放疗相对敏感的肿瘤组织学类型(即小细胞肺癌、白血病、淋巴瘤、生殖细胞瘤和多发性骨髓瘤)。
手术切除联合 WBRT 与单纯 WBRT
1 级:I 级证据支持与单纯 WBRT 相比,在一般状况良好(功能独立,卧床时间少于 50%)和局限性颅外疾病的患者中使用手术切除联合术后 WBRT。对于一般状况评分较差、晚期全身疾病或多发脑转移瘤患者,尚无足够证据推荐。