Okamoto Scott K, Helm Susana, Giroux Danielle, Kaliades Alexis, Kawano Kaycee Nahe, Kulis Stephen
School of Social Work, Hawai'i Pacific University, 1188 Fort St. Mall, Honolulu, HI 96813, USA.
J Prim Prev. 2010 Dec;31(5-6):311-9. doi: 10.1007/s10935-010-0222-8.
This study examines the drug resistance strategies described by Native Hawaiian youth residing in rural communities. Sixty-four youth from 7 middle and intermediate schools on the Island of Hawai'i participated in a series of gender-specific focus groups. Youth responded to 15 drug-related problem situations developed and validated from prior research. A total of 509 responses reflecting primary or secondary drug resistance strategies were identified by the youth, which were qualitatively collapsed into 16 different categories. Primary drug resistance strategies were those that participants listed as a single response, or the first part of a two-part response, while secondary drug resistance strategies were those that were used in tandem with primary drug resistance strategies. Over half of the responses reflecting primary drug resistance strategies fell into three different categories ("refuse," "explain," or "angry refusal"), whereas over half of the responses reflecting secondary drug resistance strategies represented one category ("explain"). Significant gender differences were found in the frequency of using different strategies as well as variations in the frequency of using different strategies based on the type of drug offerer (family versus friends/peers). Implications for prevention practice are discussed.
本研究考察了居住在农村社区的夏威夷原住民青年所描述的耐药策略。来自夏威夷岛7所初中和中级中学的64名青年参加了一系列针对性别的焦点小组讨论。青年们对先前研究中开发并验证的15种与毒品相关的问题情境做出了回应。青年们共给出了509条反映主要或次要耐药策略的回答,这些回答在定性上被归纳为16个不同类别。主要耐药策略是参与者列为单一回答或两部分回答的第一部分的那些策略,而次要耐药策略是与主要耐药策略一起使用的那些策略。反映主要耐药策略的回答中,超过一半属于三个不同类别(“拒绝”、“解释”或“愤怒拒绝”),而反映次要耐药策略的回答中,超过一半属于一个类别(“解释”)。在使用不同策略的频率以及基于毒品提供者类型(家人与朋友/同龄人)使用不同策略的频率差异方面,发现了显著的性别差异。文中讨论了对预防实践的启示。