Biological Rhythms Research Laboratory, Department of Behavioral Sciences, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA.
Chronobiol Int. 2010 Aug;27(7):1469-92. doi: 10.3109/07420528.2010.503293.
Adolescents often report shorter time in bed and earlier wake-up times on school days compared to weekend days. Extending sleep on weekend nights may reflect a "recovery" process as youngsters try to compensate for an accumulated school-week sleep debt. The authors examined whether the circadian timing system of adolescents shifted after keeping a common late weekend "recovery" sleep schedule; it was hypothesized that a circadian phase delay shift would follow this later and longer weekend sleep. The second aim of this study was to test whether modifying sleep timing or light exposure on weekends while still providing recovery sleep can stabilize the circadian system. Two experiments addressed these aims. Experiment 1 was a 4-wk, within-subjects counterbalanced design comparing two weekend sleep schedule conditions, "TYPICAL" and "NAP." Compared to weeknights, participants retired 1.5 h later and woke 3 h later on TYPICAL weekends but 1 h later on NAP weekends, which also included a 2-h afternoon nap. Experiment 2 was a 2-wk, between-subjects design with two groups ("TYPICAL" or "LIGHT") that differed by weekend morning light exposure. TYPICAL and LIGHT groups followed the TYPICAL weekend schedule of Experiment 1, and the LIGHT group received 1 h of light (454-484 nm) upon weekend wake-up. Weekend time in bed was 1.5 h longer/night than weeknights in both experimental protocols. Participants slept at home during the study. Dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) phase was assessed in the laboratory before (Friday) and after (Sunday) each weekend. Participants were ages 15 to 17 yrs. Twelve participants (4 boys) were included in Experiment 1, and 33 (10 boys) were included in Experiment 2. DLMO phase delayed over TYPICAL weekends in Experiment 1 by (mean +/- SD) 45 +/- 31 min and Experiment 2 by 46 +/- 34 min. DLMO phase also delayed over NAP weekends (41 +/- 34 min) and did not differ from the TYPICAL condition of Experiment 1. DLMO phase delayed over LIGHT weekends (38 +/- 28 min) and did not differ from the TYPICAL group of Experiment 2. In summary, adolescents phase delay after keeping a commonly observed weekend sleep schedule. Waking earlier or exposure to short-wavelength light on weekend mornings, however, did not stabilize circadian timing in this sample of youngsters. These data inform chronotherapy interventions and underscore the need to test circadian phase-shifting responses to light in this age group.
青少年在上学日的睡眠时间通常比周末短,醒来的时间也更早。在周末晚上延长睡眠时间可能反映了一种“恢复”过程,因为青少年试图弥补一周的睡眠债务。作者研究了青少年的昼夜节律系统在保持常见的周末“恢复”睡眠时间表后是否发生了变化;他们假设,随后的周末睡眠时间延长会导致昼夜节律相位延迟。本研究的第二个目的是测试在提供恢复性睡眠的同时,改变周末的睡眠时间或光照,是否可以稳定昼夜节律系统。两个实验解决了这些目标。实验 1 是一项为期 4 周的、被试内平衡设计的比较,比较了两种周末睡眠时间表条件,“典型”和“小睡”。与平日相比,参与者在“典型”周末晚睡 1.5 小时,晚起 3 小时,但在“小睡”周末晚 1 小时起床,并且还包括下午 2 小时的小睡。实验 2 是一项为期 2 周的、被试间设计,分为两组(“典型”或“光照”),它们在周末早上的光照暴露方面有所不同。“典型”和“光照”组遵循实验 1 的“典型”周末时间表,而“光照”组在周末醒来时接受 1 小时的光(454-484nm)。在两个实验方案中,周末的睡眠时间比平日每晚长 1.5 小时。参与者在研究期间在家中睡觉。在每个周末之前(星期五)和之后(星期天)在实验室评估褪黑素分泌初始时间(DLMO)相位。参与者年龄在 15 至 17 岁之间。实验 1 有 12 名参与者(4 名男孩),实验 2 有 33 名参与者(10 名男孩)。在实验 1 中,DLMO 相位在“典型”周末时延迟了 45+/-31 分钟,在实验 2 中延迟了 46+/-34 分钟。在“小睡”周末,DLMO 相位也延迟了 41+/-34 分钟,与实验 1 的“典型”条件没有区别。在“光照”周末,DLMO 相位延迟了 38+/-28 分钟,与实验 2 的“典型”组没有区别。总之,青少年在保持常见的周末睡眠时间表后会出现相位延迟。然而,在周末早上更早醒来或暴露在短波长光线下,并没有稳定这个年龄段青少年的昼夜节律时间。这些数据为时间疗法干预提供了信息,并强调需要在该年龄组中测试对光的昼夜节律相位移动反应。