Department of Sociology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA 90095-1551, USA.
Demography. 2011 Feb;48(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s13524-011-0014-7.
The study of intergenerational mobility and most population research are governed by a two-generation (parent-to-offspring) view of intergenerational influence, to the neglect of the effects of grandparents and other ancestors and nonresident contemporary kin. While appropriate for some populations in some periods, this perspective may omit important sources of intergenerational continuity of family-based social inequality. Social institutions, which transcend individual lives, help support multigenerational influence, particularly at the extreme top and bottom of the social hierarchy, but to some extent in the middle as well. Multigenerational influence also works through demographic processes because families influence subsequent generations through differential fertility and survival, migration, and marriage patterns, as well as through direct transmission of socioeconomic rewards, statuses, and positions. Future research should attend more closely to multigenerational effects; to the tandem nature of demographic and socioeconomic reproduction; and to data, measures, and models that transcend co-resident nuclear families.
代际流动研究和大多数人口研究都受到两代人(父母到子女)代际影响观点的支配,而忽略了祖父母和其他祖先以及非居住的当代亲属的影响。虽然这种观点在某些时期和某些人群中是合适的,但它可能会忽略家庭为基础的社会不平等的代际连续性的重要来源。超越个人生活的社会制度有助于支持多代际影响,特别是在社会等级的极端顶层和底层,但在一定程度上也存在于中层。多代际影响也通过人口过程起作用,因为家庭通过不同的生育和生存、迁移和婚姻模式,以及通过社会经济回报、地位和职位的直接传递,影响后代。未来的研究应该更加关注多代际效应;关注人口和社会经济再生产的串联性质;以及关注超越共同居住的核心家庭的数据、措施和模型。