Rapid Response Radiotherapy Program, Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Support Care Cancer. 2012 Mar;20(3):549-55. doi: 10.1007/s00520-011-1120-1. Epub 2011 Mar 1.
The primary objective of this study was to compare the symptom severity in two different patient populations assessed in an outpatient palliative radiotherapy clinic over two time periods spanning 10 years. The secondary objective was to assess any changes in the baseline demographics of these patients.
Data were collected from 1999 to 2009. Upon initial presentation to the clinic, the Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) was administered to patients to capture symptom severity. This validated assessment tool asks patients to score their level of pain, tiredness, nausea, depression, anxiety, drowsiness, loss of appetite, well-being, and dyspnea on an 11-point Likert scale. Differences between the two patient groups were assessed using chi-squared analysis and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant.
A total of 1,439 patients completed the ESAS from 1999 to 2009. Patients were divided into two time periods 1999-2002 (n = 689) and 2006-2009 (n = 750). Pain, depression, nausea, fatigue, anxiety, drowsiness, and dyspnea were significantly better in 2006-2009 (p < 0.0001). Loss of appetite was not statistically different between the two time periods (p = 0.236). Significantly more patients with genitourinary cancers (p = 0.03) or a referral for a mass (p < 0.0001) were seen in 2006-2009. More patients with breast cancer (p = 0.04) and bone pain (p = 0.0002) were seen in 1999-2002. The median age was significantly higher (70 years vs. 68 years, p = 0.03) for patients seen in 2006-2009. No significant differences were seen in performance status or gender between the two groups.
There have been statistically significant lower scores in the severity of the majority of symptoms as scored by the latter patient cohort; however, whether this difference in magnitude is clinically significant is debatable. The reason for referral and demographics in patients sent for palliative radiotherapy has changed over a 10-year period. This may be a reflection of the changes in systemic therapies and improvements in supportive care for patients with advanced cancer.
本研究的主要目的是比较在两个不同时间段(跨越 10 年)的门诊姑息性放疗诊所评估的两个患者群体的症状严重程度。次要目的是评估这些患者的基线人口统计学特征是否有任何变化。
数据收集自 1999 年至 2009 年。患者初次就诊时,采用埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS)评估其症状严重程度。该经过验证的评估工具要求患者对疼痛、疲劳、恶心、抑郁、焦虑、嗜睡、食欲减退、幸福感和呼吸困难的程度进行 11 分李克特评分。使用卡方检验和 Wilcoxon 秩和检验比较两组患者之间的差异。p 值<0.05 被认为具有统计学意义。
共有 1439 名患者于 1999 年至 2009 年完成了 ESAS。患者分为两个时间段:1999 年至 2002 年(n=689)和 2006 年至 2009 年(n=750)。2006 年至 2009 年疼痛、抑郁、恶心、疲劳、焦虑、嗜睡和呼吸困难明显改善(p<0.0001)。两个时间段之间食欲减退无统计学差异(p=0.236)。2006 年至 2009 年就诊的患者中,生殖泌尿系统癌症(p=0.03)或就诊为肿块的患者(p<0.0001)明显更多。1999 年至 2002 年就诊的患者中,乳腺癌(p=0.04)和骨痛(p=0.0002)患者明显更多。2006 年至 2009 年就诊的患者中位年龄明显更高(70 岁 vs. 68 岁,p=0.03)。两组患者的表现状态或性别无显著差异。
在后一组患者中,大多数症状的严重程度评分明显较低;然而,这种幅度的差异是否具有临床意义仍存在争议。在过去的 10 年中,接受姑息性放疗的患者的转诊原因和人口统计学特征发生了变化。这可能反映了晚期癌症患者的系统治疗变化和支持性护理的改善。