Reddy Shantan, Bruera Eduardo, Pace Ellen, Zhang Karen, Reyes-Gibby Cielito C
Department of Palliative Care and Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA.
J Palliat Med. 2007 Oct;10(5):1068-75. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2007.0007.
Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most common symptom experienced by patients with cancer. Clinically important improvement in the intensity of fatigue in palliative care patients has not been well established. We reviewed the data from 3 clinical trials of fatigue in 194 patients receiving palliative care treatment. Patients completed the Functional Assessment for Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) and Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS) at baseline and day 8 and their global perception of fatigue improvement (Global benefit score [GBS]: 1 = not beneficial, 7 = greatly important] during day 8. A GBS of 4 or more (moderate improvement, consistently beneficial) was considered a clinically significant improvement. Change scores in the ESAS and FACIT-F from baseline to day 8 were compared to the GBS greater than 4. Receiver-operating characteristic curves were also derived for ESAS and FACIT-F change scores for a GBS greater than 4, greater than 5, and greater than 6. Results showed the mean patient age was 56 (+/-12) years, and 37% were men. A reduction of approximately 10 points in FACIT-F (sensitivity = 73%, specificity = 78%, area under the curve = 0.82) and 4 points in ESAS fatigue (sensitivity = 66%, specificity = 72%, area under the curve = 0.78) score was best able to predict a clinically important improvement (GBS >/= 4). We were able to characterize the relationship between FACIT-F and ESAS scores and patients' global perception of improvement but further studies are needed to validate our findings.
癌症相关疲劳(CRF)是癌症患者最常见的症状。姑息治疗患者疲劳强度在临床上的重要改善尚未得到充分证实。我们回顾了194例接受姑息治疗的患者的3项疲劳临床试验数据。患者在基线期和第8天完成了慢性病治疗功能评估疲劳量表(FACIT-F)和埃德蒙顿症状评估系统(ESAS),并在第8天对疲劳改善进行整体感知评估(整体获益评分[GBS]:1=无益处,7=非常重要)。GBS为4或更高(中度改善,持续有益)被认为是具有临床意义的改善。将ESAS和FACIT-F从基线期到第8天的变化分数与大于4的GBS进行比较。还针对大于4、大于5和大于6的GBS得出了ESAS和FACIT-F变化分数的受试者操作特征曲线。结果显示,患者平均年龄为56(±12)岁,37%为男性。FACIT-F分数降低约10分(敏感性=73%,特异性=78%,曲线下面积=0.82)和ESAS疲劳分数降低4分(敏感性=66%,特异性=72%,曲线下面积=0.78)最能预测具有临床意义的改善(GBS≥4)。我们能够描述FACIT-F和ESAS分数与患者整体改善感知之间的关系,但需要进一步研究来验证我们的发现。