Suppr超能文献

随机、安慰剂对照比较阿米替林、度洛西汀和普瑞巴林治疗慢性糖尿病周围神经性疼痛患者的疗效:对疼痛、多导睡眠图睡眠、日间功能和生活质量的影响。

Randomized, placebo-controlled comparison of amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin in patients with chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain: impact on pain, polysomnographic sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life.

机构信息

Surrey Clinical Research Centre, Institute of Biosciences and Medicine, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, UK.

出版信息

Diabetes Care. 2012 Dec;35(12):2451-8. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0656. Epub 2012 Sep 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Chronic diabetic peripheral neuropathic pain (DPNP) is difficult to treat, with treatment regimens often inadequate at controlling pain and limited by side effects and drug tolerance. Secondary parameters, such as quality of sleep and mood, may also be important for successful DPNP management. The objectives of this study were to compare the analgesic efficacy of pregabalin, amitriptyline, and duloxetine, and their effect on polysomnographic sleep, daytime functioning, and quality of life in patients with DPNP.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized, parallel group investigation of type 1 and 2 diabetic subjects with DPNP. Each treatment group had a single-blind, 8-day, placebo run-in followed by 14 days of lower-dose and 14 days of higher-dose medication. At the end of each dose titration period, subjective pain, sleep, and daytime functioning were assessed during a 2-day residential period.

RESULTS

All medications reduced pain when compared with placebo, but no one treatment was superior to any other. For sleep, pregabalin improved sleep continuity (P < 0.001), whereas duloxetine increased wake and reduced total sleep time (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001). Despite negative effects on sleep, duloxetine enhanced central nervous system arousal and performance on sensory motor tasks. There were no significant safety findings; however, there was a significantly higher number of adverse events in the pregabalin treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in analgesic efficacy between amitriptyline, duloxetine, and pregabalin. However, there were significant differences in the secondary parameters, which may be of relevance when deciding the optimal treatment for DPNP.

摘要

目的

慢性糖尿病周围神经性疼痛(DPNP)难以治疗,治疗方案往往无法充分控制疼痛,且受副作用和药物耐受性限制。次要参数,如睡眠质量和情绪,对于成功管理 DPNP 也可能很重要。本研究的目的是比较普瑞巴林、阿米替林和度洛西汀的镇痛效果及其对 DPNP 患者多导睡眠图睡眠、白天功能和生活质量的影响。

研究设计和方法

这是一项针对 1 型和 2 型糖尿病合并 DPNP 患者的双盲、随机、平行组研究。每个治疗组都有一个为期 8 天的单盲安慰剂导入期,然后是 14 天的低剂量和 14 天的高剂量药物治疗。在每个剂量滴定期结束时,在为期 2 天的住院期间评估主观疼痛、睡眠和白天功能。

结果

与安慰剂相比,所有药物均能减轻疼痛,但没有一种药物优于其他药物。对于睡眠,普瑞巴林改善了睡眠连续性(P < 0.001),而度洛西汀增加了觉醒并减少了总睡眠时间(P < 0.01 和 P < 0.001)。尽管对睡眠有负面影响,但度洛西汀增强了中枢神经系统的觉醒和感觉运动任务的表现。没有发现明显的安全性发现;然而,普瑞巴林治疗组的不良事件数量明显更高。

结论

阿米替林、度洛西汀和普瑞巴林在镇痛效果方面没有显著差异。然而,在次要参数方面存在显著差异,这在决定 DPNP 的最佳治疗方案时可能具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7beb/3507552/0ca03cc5440e/2451fig1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验