Kwong Elizabeth
Kwong Eureka Solutions, Quebec, Canada.
J Pharm Sci. 2015 Mar;104(3):865-71. doi: 10.1002/jps.24294. Epub 2014 Dec 5.
Current industry perspective of how discovery is conducted seems to be fragmented and does not have a unified overall outlook of how discovery challenges are being addressed. Consequently, well-defined processes and drug-likeness criteria are being viewed as "broken" and will not maintain future R&D productivity. In this commentary, an analysis of existing practices for defining successful development candidates resulted in a 5 "must do" list to help advance Drug Discovery as presented from a Pharmaceutics perspective. The 5 "must do" list includes: what an ideal discovery team model should look like, what criteria should be considered for the desired development candidate profile, what the building blocks of the development candidate should look like, and how to assess the development risks of the candidate.
当前业界对于药物研发过程的看法似乎较为零散,缺乏一个关于如何应对研发挑战的统一整体观点。因此,明确的流程和类药性质标准被视为“已失效”,无法维持未来的研发效率。在本评论中,从药剂学角度对确定成功研发候选药物的现有做法进行分析,得出了一个“必须做的五件事”清单,以助力推进药物研发。这“必须做的五件事”清单包括:理想的研发团队模式应是怎样的,对于期望的研发候选药物概况应考虑哪些标准,研发候选药物的组成部分应是怎样的,以及如何评估候选药物的研发风险。