Kim Hyun-Jun, Kim Young Saing, Park Se Hoon
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Konkuk University, Chungju, South Korea.
Department of Internal Medicine, Gachon University Gil Medical Center, Incheon, South Korea.
BMC Palliat Care. 2015 Sep 16;14:41. doi: 10.1186/s12904-015-0038-7.
For cancer patients with inadequate pain relief, a switch to an alternative opioid is the preferred option for symptomatic improvement. However, multiple opioids are often simultaneously administered for anecdotal reasons. This prospective study evaluated pain response to either opioid rotation or combination in patients with uncontrolled cancer pain.
Patients suffering with uncontrolled cancer pain despite dose titration were randomly assigned to opioid rotation group or opioid combination group. Patients answered a questionnaire that included items on pain severity (0 to 10) and interferences at baseline and after one week.
Of the 50 patients registered, 39 patients answered the questionnaire after one week of treatment. After one week, the mean pain scores were significantly improved in both groups. Ten patients (42%) in the rotation group and 16 patients (62%) in the combination group reported that they achieved relief from pain (p = 0.08). The incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups, but fewer patients experienced constipation with opioid rotation than with combination (17% vs. 42%, respectively; p = 0.05). The frequency of rescue analgesics (50% vs. 69%; p = 0.17) and dose modification (29% vs. 38%; p = 0.49) were similar in the rotation and combination groups.
For patients with chronic uncontrolled cancer pain, both opioid rotation and combination strategies appear to provide significant relief of pain and improved patient satisfaction.
This study was registered in advance to ClinicalTrials.gov (no. NCT00478101).
对于疼痛缓解不足的癌症患者,换用另一种阿片类药物是改善症状的首选方案。然而,出于一些经验性原因,多种阿片类药物常常同时使用。这项前瞻性研究评估了阿片类药物轮换或联合使用对癌症疼痛控制不佳患者疼痛反应的影响。
尽管进行了剂量滴定但癌症疼痛仍未得到控制的患者被随机分配至阿片类药物轮换组或阿片类药物联合组。患者回答了一份问卷,其中包括基线时和一周后的疼痛严重程度(0至10)及干扰因素等项目。
在登记的50例患者中,39例患者在治疗一周后回答了问卷。一周后,两组的平均疼痛评分均显著改善。轮换组的10例患者(42%)和联合组的16例患者(62%)报告疼痛得到缓解(p = 0.08)。两组不良事件的发生率相似,但与联合使用阿片类药物相比,阿片类药物轮换组便秘的患者较少(分别为17%和42%;p = 0.05)。轮换组和联合组抢救性镇痛药的使用频率(50%对69%;p = 0.17)和剂量调整频率(29%对38%;p = 0.49)相似。
对于慢性癌症疼痛控制不佳的患者,阿片类药物轮换和联合策略似乎都能显著缓解疼痛并提高患者满意度。
本研究已提前在ClinicalTrials.gov注册(编号:NCT00478101)。