Ding Ding, Rogers Kris, van der Ploeg Hidde, Stamatakis Emmanuel, Bauman Adrian E
Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.
PLoS Med. 2015 Dec 8;12(12):e1001917. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001917. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Lifestyle risk behaviors are responsible for a large proportion of disease burden worldwide. Behavioral risk factors, such as smoking, poor diet, and physical inactivity, tend to cluster within populations and may have synergistic effects on health. As evidence continues to accumulate on emerging lifestyle risk factors, such as prolonged sitting and unhealthy sleep patterns, incorporating these new risk factors will provide clinically relevant information on combinations of lifestyle risk factors.
Using data from a large Australian cohort of middle-aged and older adults, this is the first study to our knowledge to examine a lifestyle risk index incorporating sedentary behavior and sleep in relation to all-cause mortality. Baseline data (February 2006- April 2009) were linked to mortality registration data until June 15, 2014. Smoking, high alcohol intake, poor diet, physical inactivity, prolonged sitting, and unhealthy (short/long) sleep duration were measured by questionnaires and summed into an index score. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used with the index score and each unique risk combination as exposure variables, adjusted for socio-demographic characteristics. During 6 y of follow-up of 231,048 participants for 1,409,591 person-years, 15,635 deaths were registered. Of all participants, 31.2%, 36.9%, 21.4%, and 10.6% reported 0, 1, 2, and 3+ risk factors, respectively. There was a strong relationship between the lifestyle risk index score and all-cause mortality. The index score had good predictive validity (c index = 0.763), and the partial population attributable risk was 31.3%. Out of all 96 possible risk combinations, the 30 most commonly occurring combinations accounted for more than 90% of the participants. Among those, combinations involving physical inactivity, prolonged sitting, and/or long sleep duration and combinations involving smoking and high alcohol intake had the strongest associations with all-cause mortality. Limitations of the study include self-reported and under-specified measures, dichotomized risk scores, lack of long-term patterns of lifestyle behaviors, and lack of cause-specific mortality data.
Adherence to healthy lifestyle behaviors could reduce the risk for death from all causes. Specific combinations of lifestyle risk behaviors may be more harmful than others, suggesting synergistic relationships among risk factors.
生活方式风险行为在全球疾病负担中占很大比例。行为风险因素,如吸烟、不良饮食和身体活动不足,往往在人群中聚集,可能对健康产生协同效应。随着关于久坐不动和不健康睡眠模式等新兴生活方式风险因素的证据不断积累,纳入这些新的风险因素将提供有关生活方式风险因素组合的临床相关信息。
利用来自澳大利亚一个大型中老年人群队列的数据,据我们所知,这是第一项研究生活方式风险指数(纳入久坐行为和睡眠)与全因死亡率之间关系的研究。基线数据(2006年2月至2009年4月)与截至2014年6月15日的死亡率登记数据相关联。通过问卷调查测量吸烟、高酒精摄入量、不良饮食、身体活动不足、久坐不动和不健康(短/长)睡眠时间,并将其汇总为指数得分。使用Cox比例风险分析,将指数得分和每种独特的风险组合作为暴露变量,并根据社会人口学特征进行调整。在对231,048名参与者进行6年随访的1,409,591人年期间,登记了15,635例死亡。在所有参与者中,分别有31.2%、36.9%、21.4%和10.6%的人报告有0、1、2和3种以上风险因素。生活方式风险指数得分与全因死亡率之间存在密切关系。该指数得分具有良好的预测效度(c指数=0.763),部分人群归因风险为31.3%。在所有96种可能的风险组合中,30种最常见的组合占参与者的90%以上。其中,涉及身体活动不足、久坐不动和/或长时间睡眠的组合以及涉及吸烟和高酒精摄入量的组合与全因死亡率的关联最强。该研究的局限性包括自我报告和测量不明确、风险得分二分法、缺乏生活方式行为的长期模式以及缺乏特定病因的死亡率数据。
坚持健康的生活方式行为可以降低全因死亡风险。生活方式风险行为的特定组合可能比其他组合更有害,这表明风险因素之间存在协同关系。