Prieto Peter A, Reuben Alexandre, Cooper Zachary A, Wargo Jennifer A
From the Departments of *Surgical Oncology and †Genomic Medicine, University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Cancer J. 2016 Mar-Apr;22(2):138-46. doi: 10.1097/PPO.0000000000000182.
The age of personalized medicine continues to evolve within clinical oncology with the arsenal available to clinicians in a variety of malignancies expanding at an exponential rate. The development and advancement of molecular treatment modalities, including targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade, continue to flourish. Treatment with targeted therapy (BRAF, MEK, and other small molecule inhibitors) can be associated with swift disease control and high response rates, but limited durability when used as monotherapy. Conversely, treatment with immune checkpoint blockade monotherapy regimens (anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 and anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed cell death protein 1 ligand) tends to have lower response rates than that observed with BRAF-targeted therapy, although these treatments may offer long-term durable disease control. With the advent of these forms of therapy, there was interest early on in empirically combining targeted therapy with immune checkpoint blockade with the hopes of preserving high response rates and adding durability; however, there is now strong scientific rationale for combining these forms of therapy-and early evidence of synergy in preclinical models of melanoma. Clinical trials combining these strategies are ongoing, and mature data regarding response rates and durability are not yet available. Synergy may ultimately be apparent; however, it has also become clear that complexities exist regarding toxicity when combining these therapies. Nonetheless, this increased appreciation of the complex interplay between oncogenic mutations and antitumor immunity has opened up tremendous opportunities for studying targeted agents and immunotherapy in combination, which extends far beyond melanoma to other solid tumors and also to hematologic malignancies.
在临床肿瘤学领域,个性化医疗时代持续演进,临床医生在各种恶性肿瘤中可使用的武器库正以指数级速度扩充。包括靶向治疗和免疫检查点阻断在内的分子治疗模式不断发展进步。靶向治疗(BRAF、MEK及其他小分子抑制剂)可实现迅速的疾病控制且缓解率高,但单药使用时疗效持续时间有限。相反,免疫检查点阻断单药治疗方案(抗细胞毒性T淋巴细胞抗原4和抗程序性细胞死亡蛋白1/程序性细胞死亡蛋白1配体)的缓解率往往低于BRAF靶向治疗,不过这些治疗可能带来长期持久的疾病控制。随着这些治疗形式的出现,早期有人尝试将靶向治疗与免疫检查点阻断经验性联合,以期保持高缓解率并延长疗效持续时间;然而,现在有强有力的科学依据支持联合这些治疗形式,并且在黑色素瘤临床前模型中有早期协同作用的证据。联合这些策略的临床试验正在进行,关于缓解率和疗效持续时间的成熟数据尚未可得。协同作用最终可能会显现;然而,联合这些治疗时毒性方面存在复杂性也已变得清晰。尽管如此,对致癌突变与抗肿瘤免疫之间复杂相互作用的进一步认识为联合研究靶向药物和免疫疗法带来了巨大机遇,这远远超出黑色素瘤,涵盖其他实体瘤以及血液系统恶性肿瘤。