Cooper Tess E, Derry Sheena, Wiffen Philip J, Moore R Andrew
Cochrane Pain, Palliative and Supportive Care Review Group, Cochrane, Oxford Pain Research, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
Pain Research and Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (Nuffield Division of Anaesthetics), University of Oxford, Pain Research Unit, Churchill Hospital, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK, OX3 7LE.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jan 3;1(1):CD012188. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012188.pub2.
This review replaces part of an earlier review that evaluated gabapentin for both neuropathic pain and fibromyalgia, now split into separate reviews for the two conditions. This review will consider pain in fibromyalgia only.Fibromyalgia is associated with widespread pain lasting longer than three months, and is frequently associated with symptoms such as poor sleep, fatigue, depression, and reduced quality of life. Fibromyalgia is more common in women.Gabapentin is an antiepileptic drug widely licensed for treatment of neuropathic pain. It is not licensed for the treatment of fibromyalgia, but is commonly used because fibromyalgia can respond to the same medicines as neuropathic pain.
To assess the analgesic efficacy of gabapentin for fibromyalgia pain in adults and the adverse events associated with its use in clinical trials.
We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) via the Cochrane Register of Studies Online, MEDLINE via Ovid and Embase via Ovid from inception to 24 May 2016. We also searched the reference lists of retrieved studies and reviews, and searched online clinical trial registries.
Randomised, double-blind trials of eight weeks' duration or longer for treating fibromyalgia pain in adults, comparing gabapentin with placebo or an active comparator.
Two independent review authors extracted data and assessed trial quality and risk of bias. We planned to use dichotomous data to calculate risk ratio and number needed to treat for one additional event, using standard methods. We assessed the evidence using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and created a 'Summary of findings' table.
Two studies tested gabapentin to treat fibromyalgia pain. One was identified in previous versions of the review and is included here. We identified another study as a conference abstract, with insufficient detail to determine eligibility for inclusion; it is awaiting assessment. The one included study of 150 participants was a 12-week, multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study using last-observation-carried-forward imputation for withdrawals. The maximum dose was 2400 mg daily. The overall risk of bias was low, except for attrition bias.At the end of the trial, the outcome of 50% reduction in pain over baseline was not reported. The outcome of 30% or greater reduction in pain over baseline was achieved by 38/75 participants (49%) with gabapentin compared with 23/75 (31%) with placebo (very low quality). A patient global impression of change any category of "better" was achieved by 68/75 (91%) with gabapentin and 35/75 (47%) with placebo (very low quality).Nineteen participants discontinued the study because of adverse events: 12 in the gabapentin group (16%) and 7 in the placebo group (9%) (very low quality). The number of serious adverse events were not reported, and no deaths were reported (very low quality).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: We have only very low quality evidence and are very uncertain about estimates of benefit and harm because of a small amount of data from a single trial. There is insufficient evidence to support or refute the suggestion that gabapentin reduces pain in fibromyalgia.
本综述取代了之前一篇评估加巴喷丁治疗神经病理性疼痛和纤维肌痛的综述的部分内容,现在这两种情况已分为单独的综述。本综述仅考虑纤维肌痛中的疼痛。纤维肌痛与持续超过三个月的广泛疼痛相关,并且经常伴有睡眠不佳、疲劳、抑郁和生活质量下降等症状。纤维肌痛在女性中更为常见。加巴喷丁是一种广泛获批用于治疗神经病理性疼痛的抗癫痫药物。它未获批用于治疗纤维肌痛,但由于纤维肌痛对与神经病理性疼痛相同的药物有反应,所以常被使用。
评估加巴喷丁对成人纤维肌痛疼痛的镇痛效果以及在临床试验中使用该药相关的不良事件。
我们通过Cochrane在线研究注册库检索了Cochrane对照试验中心注册库(CENTRAL),通过Ovid检索了MEDLINE以及通过Ovid检索了Embase,检索时间从数据库创建至2016年5月24日。我们还检索了检索到的研究和综述的参考文献列表,并检索了在线临床试验注册库。
为期八周或更长时间的随机、双盲试验,用于治疗成人纤维肌痛疼痛,将加巴喷丁与安慰剂或活性对照药进行比较。
两名独立的综述作者提取数据并评估试验质量和偏倚风险。我们计划使用二分数据,采用标准方法计算风险比和需治疗人数以获得一个额外事件。我们使用GRADE(推荐分级评估、制定与评价)评估证据,并创建了一个“结果总结”表。
两项研究测试了加巴喷丁治疗纤维肌痛疼痛。一项在本综述的先前版本中已被识别并包含在此处。我们将另一项研究识别为会议摘要,其细节不足以确定是否符合纳入标准;正在等待评估。纳入的一项有150名参与者的研究是一项为期12周、多中心、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的平行组研究,对退出者采用末次观察结转法。最大剂量为每日2400毫克。除失访偏倚外,总体偏倚风险较低。在试验结束时,未报告疼痛较基线降低50%的结果。与安慰剂组的23/75(31%)相比,加巴喷丁组的38/75(49%)实现了疼痛较基线降低30%或更多(极低质量)。加巴喷丁组的68/75(91%)和安慰剂组的35/75(47%)患者在任何“好转”类别的总体印象改善方面有变化(极低质量)。19名参与者因不良事件退出研究:加巴喷丁组12名(16%),安慰剂组7名(9%)(极低质量)。未报告严重不良事件的数量,也未报告死亡情况(极低质量)。
由于来自单个试验的数据量少,我们只有极低质量的证据,并且对获益和危害的估计非常不确定。没有足够的证据支持或反驳加巴喷丁可减轻纤维肌痛疼痛这一观点。