Aleppo Grazia, Ruedy Katrina J, Riddlesworth Tonya D, Kruger Davida F, Peters Anne L, Hirsch Irl, Bergenstal Richard M, Toschi Elena, Ahmann Andrew J, Shah Viral N, Rickels Michael R, Bode Bruce W, Philis-Tsimikas Athena, Pop-Busui Rodica, Rodriguez Henry, Eyth Emily, Bhargava Anuj, Kollman Craig, Beck Roy W
Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Jaeb Center for Health Research, Tampa, FL.
Diabetes Care. 2017 Apr;40(4):538-545. doi: 10.2337/dc16-2482. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
To determine whether the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) without confirmatory blood glucose monitoring (BGM) measurements is as safe and effective as using CGM adjunctive to BGM in adults with well-controlled type 1 diabetes (T1D).
A randomized noninferiority clinical trial was conducted at 14 sites in the T1D Exchange Clinic Network. Participants were ≥18 years of age (mean 44 ± 14 years), had T1D for ≥1 year (mean duration 24 ± 12 years), used an insulin pump, and had an HbA ≤9.0% (≤75 mmol/mL) (mean 7.0 ± 0.7% [53 ± 7.7 mmol/mol]); prestudy, 47% were CGM users. Participants were randomly assigned 2:1 to the CGM-only ( = 149) or CGM+BGM ( = 77) group. The primary outcome was time in range (70-180 mg/dL) over the 26-week trial, with a prespecified noninferiority limit of 7.5%.
CGM use averaged 6.7 ± 0.5 and 6.8 ± 0.4 days/week in the CGM-only and CGM+BGM groups, respectively, over the 26-week trial. BGM tests per day (including the two required daily for CGM calibration) averaged 2.8 ± 0.9 and 5.4 ± 1.4 in the two groups, respectively ( < 0.001). Mean time in 70-180 mg/dL was 63 ± 13% at both baseline and 26 weeks in the CGM-only group and 65 ± 13% and 65 ± 11% in the CGM+BGM group (adjusted difference 0%; one-sided 95% CI -2%). No severe hypoglycemic events occurred in the CGM-only group, and one occurred in the CGM+BGM group.
Use of CGM without regular use of confirmatory BGM is as safe and effective as using CGM with BGM in adults with well-controlled T1D at low risk for severe hypoglycemia.
确定在血糖控制良好的1型糖尿病(T1D)成人患者中,不使用确认性血糖监测(BGM)测量而仅使用持续葡萄糖监测(CGM)是否与使用CGM辅助BGM一样安全有效。
在T1D交换诊所网络的14个地点进行了一项随机非劣效性临床试验。参与者年龄≥18岁(平均44±14岁),患T1D≥1年(平均病程24±12年),使用胰岛素泵,糖化血红蛋白(HbA)≤9.0%(≤75 mmol/mol)(平均7.0±0.7%[53±7.7 mmol/mol]);研究前,47%的参与者使用CGM。参与者按2:1随机分配至仅使用CGM组(n = 149)或CGM + BGM组(n = 77)。主要结局是在26周试验期间血糖在目标范围内(70 - 180 mg/dL)的时间,预设非劣效性界限为7.5%。
在26周试验期间,仅使用CGM组和CGM + BGM组每周使用CGM的平均天数分别为6.7±0.5天和6.8±0.4天。两组每天的BGM检测次数(包括CGM校准所需的每日两次)分别平均为2.8±0.9次和5.4±1.4次(P < 0.001)。仅使用CGM组在基线和26周时血糖在70 - 180 mg/dL的平均时间均为63±13%,CGM + BGM组分别为65±13%和65±11%(校正差异为0%;单侧95%置信区间为 -2%)。仅使用CGM组未发生严重低血糖事件,CGM + BGM组发生了1例。
在严重低血糖风险较低、血糖控制良好的T1D成人患者中,不常规使用确认性BGM而仅使用CGM与使用CGM联合BGM一样安全有效。