Suppr超能文献

用于制药领域药物发现与开发的3D生物打印技术。

3D bioprinting for drug discovery and development in pharmaceutics.

作者信息

Peng Weijie, Datta Pallab, Ayan Bugra, Ozbolat Veli, Sosnoski Donna, Ozbolat Ibrahim T

机构信息

Jiangxi Academy of Medical Science, Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China; Department of Pharmacology, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China; Engineering Science and Mechanics Department, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA.

Centre for Healthcare Science and Technology, Indian Institute of Engineering Science and Technology Shibpur, Howrah 711103, West Bengal, India.

出版信息

Acta Biomater. 2017 Jul 15;57:26-46. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.05.025. Epub 2017 May 10.

Abstract

UNLABELLED

Successful launch of a commercial drug requires significant investment of time and financial resources wherein late-stage failures become a reason for catastrophic failures in drug discovery. This calls for infusing constant innovations in technologies, which can give reliable prediction of efficacy, and more importantly, toxicology of the compound early in the drug discovery process before clinical trials. Though computational advances have resulted in more rationale in silico designing, in vitro experimental studies still require gaining industry confidence and improving in vitro-in vivo correlations. In this quest, due to their ability to mimic the spatial and chemical attributes of native tissues, three-dimensional (3D) tissue models have now proven to provide better results for drug screening compared to traditional two-dimensional (2D) models. However, in vitro fabrication of living tissues has remained a bottleneck in realizing the full potential of 3D models. Recent advances in bioprinting provide a valuable tool to fabricate biomimetic constructs, which can be applied in different stages of drug discovery research. This paper presents the first comprehensive review of bioprinting techniques applied for fabrication of 3D tissue models for pharmaceutical studies. A comparative evaluation of different bioprinting modalities is performed to assess the performance and ability of fabricating 3D tissue models for pharmaceutical use as the critical selection of bioprinting modalities indeed plays a crucial role in efficacy and toxicology testing of drugs and accelerates the drug development cycle. In addition, limitations with current tissue models are discussed thoroughly and future prospects of the role of bioprinting in pharmaceutics are provided to the reader.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

Present advances in tissue biofabrication have crucial role to play in aiding the pharmaceutical development process achieve its objectives. Advent of three-dimensional (3D) models, in particular, is viewed with immense interest by the community due to their ability to mimic in vivo hierarchical tissue architecture and heterogeneous composition. Successful realization of 3D models will not only provide greater in vitro-in vivo correlation compared to the two-dimensional (2D) models, but also eventually replace pre-clinical animal testing, which has their own shortcomings. Amongst all fabrication techniques, bioprinting- comprising all the different modalities (extrusion-, droplet- and laser-based bioprinting), is emerging as the most viable fabrication technique to create the biomimetic tissue constructs. Notwithstanding the interest in bioprinting by the pharmaceutical development researchers, it can be seen that there is a limited availability of comparative literature which can guide the proper selection of bioprinting processes and associated considerations, such as the bioink selection for a particular pharmaceutical study. Thus, this work emphasizes these aspects of bioprinting and presents them in perspective of differential requirements of different pharmaceutical studies like in vitro predictive toxicology, high-throughput screening, drug delivery and tissue-specific efficacies. Moreover, since bioprinting techniques are mostly applied in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering, a comparative analysis of similarities and differences are also expounded to help researchers make informed decisions based on contemporary literature.

摘要

未标注

成功推出一种商业药物需要投入大量的时间和资金,其中后期失败成为药物研发中灾难性失败的一个原因。这就需要在技术上不断创新,以便在临床试验之前的药物研发早期阶段就能对化合物的疗效,更重要的是对其毒理学进行可靠预测。尽管计算技术的进步使得计算机辅助设计更具合理性,但体外实验研究仍需赢得行业信任并改善体外-体内相关性。在这一探索过程中,三维(3D)组织模型因其能够模拟天然组织的空间和化学属性,现已证明与传统二维(2D)模型相比,在药物筛选方面能提供更好的结果。然而,活组织的体外构建一直是实现3D模型全部潜力的一个瓶颈。生物打印技术的最新进展提供了一种有价值的工具来制造仿生构建体,可应用于药物研发的不同阶段。本文首次全面综述了用于制造药物研究3D组织模型的生物打印技术。对不同生物打印方式进行了比较评估,以评估制造用于药物用途的3D组织模型的性能和能力,因为生物打印方式的关键选择确实在药物的疗效和毒理学测试中起着至关重要的作用,并加速药物研发周期。此外,还深入讨论了当前组织模型的局限性,并向读者介绍了生物打印在制药领域作用的未来前景。

重要性声明

组织生物制造的当前进展在帮助制药开发过程实现其目标方面起着至关重要的作用。三维(3D)模型的出现尤其受到业界的极大关注,因为它们能够模拟体内分层组织结构和异质组成。3D模型的成功实现不仅将比二维(2D)模型提供更大的体外-体内相关性,而且最终还将取代存在自身缺点的临床前动物试验。在所有制造技术中,生物打印——包括所有不同方式(挤出式、液滴式和基于激光的生物打印)——正成为创建仿生组织构建体最可行的制造技术。尽管制药开发研究人员对生物打印感兴趣,但可以看出,能够指导正确选择生物打印工艺及相关考虑因素(如针对特定药物研究的生物墨水选择)的比较文献有限。因此,这项工作强调了生物打印的这些方面,并从不同药物研究(如体外预测毒理学、高通量筛选、药物递送和组织特异性疗效)的不同要求角度进行了阐述。此外,由于生物打印技术大多应用于再生医学和组织工程,还阐述了异同点的比较分析,以帮助研究人员根据当代文献做出明智的决策。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验