Comisión Permanente Fundación ECO, Servicio de Oncología Médica, Complejo Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Rúa Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago De Compostela, A Coruña, Spain.
Comisión Permanente Fundación ECO, Hospital General Universitario de Valencia, Valencia, Spain.
Clin Transl Oncol. 2018 May;20(5):613-618. doi: 10.1007/s12094-017-1756-5. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
Breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP) has been shown to be a prevalent and poor prognostic factor for oncologic patients, which remain under diagnosed and undertreated. In 2012, the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (SEOM) published a clinical practice guideline (CPG) for the treatment of cancer pain which specifically addressed the management of BTcP.
Fundación ECO designed a qualitative study using an Internet-based survey to investigate the attitudes toward, compliance with, and use of SEOM Guideline.
A total of 83 oncologists with a mean experience of 13 years responded. Overall, 82% were aware of different guidelines to manage BTcP. Notably, attitudes toward guidelines were highly positive and there was nearly unanimous agreement that CPG provided the best scientific evidence available (99%), on the minimum information to be gathered for the medical history (100%), on the need for a specific treatment for BTcP (100%), and fentanyl as the first-choice drug (99%). Interestingly, there were discrepancies between what oncologists agreed with and what they do in clinical practice. In fact, 87.6% declare full compliance with SEOM guideline, although adherence to registration of BTcP data in medical records ranged from 30.1 to 91.6% (mean 64.5%); therapeutic management compliance was higher ranging from 75.9 to 91.6%. Main barriers identified were time pressure together with vague statements and limited dissemination of the guidelines.
Despite oncologist's clinical practice is increasingly guided by GPC, it suffers from limited compliance, at least in part due to suboptimal statements. Improved dissemination and education are needed to enhance guideline implementation.
突破性癌症疼痛(BTcP)已被证明是肿瘤患者普遍存在且预后不良的因素,但仍未得到充分诊断和治疗。2012 年,西班牙肿瘤学会(SEOM)发布了癌症疼痛治疗的临床实践指南(CPG),专门针对 BTcP 的管理。
ECO 基金会设计了一项基于互联网的定性研究,以调查对 SEOM 指南的态度、遵守情况和使用情况。
共有 83 名平均经验为 13 年的肿瘤学家做出了回应。总体而言,82%的人了解不同的指南来管理 BTcP。值得注意的是,对指南的态度非常积极,几乎一致认为 CPG 提供了可用的最佳科学证据(99%)、对病史所需的最低信息(100%)、对 BTcP 特定治疗的需求(100%)以及芬太尼作为首选药物(99%)。有趣的是,肿瘤学家的意见和他们在临床实践中的做法之间存在差异。事实上,87.6%的人声称完全遵守 SEOM 指南,尽管在医疗记录中登记 BTcP 数据的依从性从 30.1%到 91.6%(平均 64.5%);治疗管理的依从性更高,从 75.9%到 91.6%不等。确定的主要障碍是时间压力以及指南中模糊的陈述和有限的传播。
尽管肿瘤学家的临床实践越来越受到 GPC 的指导,但由于陈述不明确和传播有限,其依从性受到限制。需要改善传播和教育,以加强指南的实施。